Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Abstracts O-5

Integrating trastuzumab (T), with or without pertuzumab (P), into perioperative chemotherapy (CT) of HER-2+ gastric cancer (GC) - subgroup analyses of EORTC 1203 “INNOVATION”, a collaboration with KCSG and DUCG

Wagner A. 1 Grabsch H. 2 Mauer M. 3 Lorenzen S. 4 Bouché O. 5 Thuss-Patience P. 6 Elme A. 7 Moehler M. 8 Romario U. Fumagalli 9 Kang Y. 10 Folprecht G. 11 Martens U. 12 Guzmán M. Galán 13 Ducreux M. 14 García M. Díez 15 Piessen G. 16 Collienne M. 3 Lordick F. 17 University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Grow School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France Department of Haematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany North Estonia Medical Center, Tallinn, Estonia Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy Department of Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany ICO L'Hospitalet - Hospital Duran i Reynals (Institut Catala D'Oncologia), Barcelona, Spain Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Vall d'Hebrón Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain University of Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

10-20% of GC are HER-2 positive. The role of perioperative anti-HER2-directed treatment is yet undefined.

This randomized, open-label phase II-trial investigated the benefit of combining T or T/P in combination with perioperative CT for HER-2-positive GC and EGJC. Between 2015 and 2021,172 of a planned 215 patients (pts) with centrally confirmed, positive HER-2 status and resectable GC or EGJC (UICC TNM stages Ib-III) were included. Recruitment was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual. Pts were randomized 1:2:2 to: Arm A (CT alone) (35 pts); Arm B (CT+ T [8mg/kg, followed by 6mg every 3 weeks]) (67 pts); Arm C (CT + T+ P [840mg every 3 weeks]) (70 pts). CT was initially cisplatin (80 mg/m2 d1) and capecitabine (2 x 1000 mg/m2/d d1) for 3 cycles before and after surgery. After publication of the FLOT-4 study, the protocol was amended to four cycles FLOT pre- and postoperatively, with FOLFOX or CAPOX as alternative for pts ineligible for FLOT. In the experimental arms, T and P were continued beyond CT at the same dose for a total of 17 cycles. Major pathological response rate (mpRR), determined by central review was the primary endpoint. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect an increase in mpRR from 25% with CT to 45% with CT+T+P or CT+T with a one-sided alpha of 10%. Possible heterogeneity of odds ratios (ORs) for mpRR between CT and CT+T+P or CT+T arms was investigated across chemotherapy regimen and other factors.

Out of 172 pts randomized, 161 eligible pts started their allocated treatment (per protocol population). Cisplatin+capecitabine was administered in 42.2%, and FLOT in 46.6% of patients. In Arm A:B:C, 90.9%, 92.2% and 81.3% completed neoadjuvant treatment. Major reason for treatment discontinuation was toxicity (70%). Surgery was performed in 84.8%, 98.4%, 92.2% pts in Arm A:B:C. R0 resection rates were 83.9%, 90.3% and 85.9%. Results of central pathology review of mpRR are available for 126 out of 150 operated pts (84.0%). MpRR was 23.3%, 37.0%, 26.4% in Arm A:B:C. The increase of 3.1% (80% CI: [-9.5%, 15.7%], one-sided p=0.378) in Arm C vs. A was not statistically significant. The increase in Arm B vs. A was 13.7% (80% CI: [0.7%,26.7%], one-sided p=0.099). Overall MpRR in all three arms was increased from 13.3% before the amendment to 42.9% thereafter (OR 4.87, p= 0.0004). MpRR was 33.3%, 53.3% and 37.9% in Arm A:B:C after amendment (OR 2.29 for CT+T vs CT; OR 1.22 for CT vs CT+T+P) while, in contrast, it was 8.3%, 16.7% and 12.5% before the amendment (OR 2.20 for CT+T vs CT; OR 1.57 for CT vs CT+T+P). ORs for mpRR between CT and CT+T or CT+T+P were consistent across investigated subgroups.

The primary endpoint analysis did not meet the pre-specified criteria of efficacy for the combination of CT+T+P. However, CT+T showed interesting response rates, especially with FLOT as CT backbone. Follow-up data, including progression free-, overall survival is necessary to define the clinical value of this regimen.

NCT02205047.

EORTC.

This study was supported by an educational grant from Roche to EORTC.

M. Mauer: Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche , Bristol Myers Squibb . O. Bouché: Honoraria (self): MSD, SERVIER, PIERRE FABRE; Advisory / Consultancy: DECIPHERA, MERCK, APMONIA THERAPEUTICS; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BAYER, AMGEN. P. Thuss-Patience: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Lilly, Astellas, Servier, Daiichi, AstraZeneca, Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck. M. Moehler: Honoraria (self): Falk, Nordic, Amgen, mci, Lilly, MSD, Taiho, Merck, Pfizer, FifePrime, BMS, ESMO, Novartis, Beigene ; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Merck, Pfizer, Beigene, Taiho, Nordic, Servier; Leadership role: Head GI Oncology, Mainz university Center; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck, Amgen, BMS, MSD, AIO, EORTC, Taiho DFG, BMBF, Horizon Europe; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS, MSD, Amgen, Merck, Nordic, Servier . G. Folprecht: Honoraria (self): Roche, MSD, BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, BMS, Daichi; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck KGaA. G. Piessen: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS, Astellas, Nestlé; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: medtronic. F. Lordick: Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Source Journal
Annals of Oncology
E ISSN 1569-8041 ISSN 0923-7534

References

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement