Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Poster P-334

Lenvatinib plus checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus sorafenib plus ICIs as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B

Ding X. Chen J. Capital Meidical University, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Beijing, China
Background

The efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with check-point inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh B had not been evaluated.

Methods

In this single-center, prospective cohort study, patients with previously untreated unresectable HCC (uHCC) with Child-Pugh B were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: one for Lenvatinib plus check-point inhibitors [ICIs] (Arm L; orally once daily, 8 mg for body weight ≥60 kg or 4 mg for body weight < 60 kg as the initial doses) and another for sorafenib plus ICIs (Arm S; 200 mg orally twice daily as the initial dose in 28-day cycles). The primary endpoint was time-to-progression (PFS; time free survival) and secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), toxicity, drug discontinuation and dose reduction. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Between May 30, 2020 and December 31, 2022, 90 patients were included (Arm L, n=57; Arm S, n=33). With a median follow-up time of 15.9 months, the median age of patients was 63 (range, 29-82) years and most of them (86.7%) were male. Among them, 82 cases (91.1%) had hepatitis-B virus infection. 55 patients (61.1%) had type I-IV portal vein tumor thrombosis and 24.4% (22) of the cohort presented with lung metastasis. Patients with Child-Pugh B7 accounted for 55.4% (50) and the ratio of patients with B8/9 was 44.6% (40). 67 patients had performed transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients in Arm L had a significantly higher ORR (43.9% vs 18.2%, P=0.021). But no difference had been demonstrated in median PFS (6.6 vs 3.5 months, P=0.67) or OS (12.4 vs 13.8 months, P=0.92) between Arm L and Arm S. Neither no significant difference in mPFS or mOS had been found between patient with Child-Pugh B7 and those with Child-Pugh B8/9. Patients who received systemic therapy combined with cTACE showed significantly improved median PFS (6.6 vs 2.8 months, P < 0.001) and OS (13.9 vs 8.0 months, P=0.011). Multivariable analysis showed that tumor objective response was identified as the significant favorable factor for both PFS (HR 0.19, 95%CI 0.098-0.38, P < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.087-0.44, P < 0.001). Also, the combination of TACE was significantly associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.30-1.0]; P=0.05). Comparable safety profiles were observed in Arm L and S. No significant difference in dose reductions (84.8% vs 70.2%) or drug discontinuations (56.1% vs 72.7%) was reported between Arm L and Arm S.

Conclusions

The regimen of Lenvatinib plus ICIs had improved ORR compared to the regimen of sorafenib plus ICIs for uHCC with Child-Pugh B. After treating with sorafenib plus ICIs or Lenvatinib plus ICIs, the prognosis of patients with uHCC was similar between the subgroup of those with Child-Pugh B7 and those with Child-Pugh B8/9.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing assistance for this abstract was assisted by MedEditing LLC.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Source Journal
Annals of Oncology
E ISSN 1569-8041 ISSN 0923-7534

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement