Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Poster P-338

Second-line treatment with modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who have failed first-line treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel

McSweeney T. Das A. O'Mahony A. O'Tighearnaigh F. O'Byrne L. Feely M. Passmore E. Keane S. Lanigan S. Fitzgerald S. Browne T. De Beer V. Dean A. Department of Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Australia
Background

As new evidence emerges, gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel is becoming increasingly more popular as first-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer due to its efficacy over single agent gemcitabine and it’s favourable toxicity profile over FOLFIRINOX. A systematic review and meta-analysis carried out by Lu et Al evaluating FOLFIRINOX as a second-line chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients that have failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed a survival benefit with FOLFIRINOX compared with other second-line regimens across all six studies. To combat the adverse events associated with FOLFIRNOX it has become commonplace to use modified dosing. In a multicenter phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX (m-FOLFIRINOX) in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer, decreased adverse events were observed with no reduction in efficacy. As a single centre in Western Australia, we have previously reported our experience of 68 patients who were treated with second-line m-FOLFIRINOX, this is an update on the previously reported data.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using an electronic database of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who received second-line m-FOLFIRINOX between December 2012 and January 2023. All patients were deemed to have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

There were 128 patients identified in our analysis, with 59% of the patients having metastatic disease. The median age of patients was 65 (range, 26 – 83). Dose intensity of m-FOLFIRINOX was as follows: 65% for oxaliplatin, 68% for irinotecan, 18% for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 68% for infusional 5-FU. The median OS of all patients was 37.0 months (95% CI, 27.0 – 49.0). The median OS of the locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma from diagnosis was 50.0 months (95% CI, 45.0 – 71.0) and 23.0 months (95% CI, 21.0 – 37.0), respectively.

Conclusions

As demonstrated by a retrospective analysis of 128 patients in a single centre in WA, modified FOLFIRINOX is an effective second-line therapy for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer who have failed first-line treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Source Journal
Annals of Oncology
E ISSN 1569-8041 ISSN 0923-7534

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement