Five Parameters Every EMS Quality Officer Should Monitor

Quality metrics are the backbone of modern healthcare systems, and emergency medical services (EMS) are no exception. In the fast-paced and often high-stress environment of prehospital care, the ability to consistently deliver high-quality services is paramount. EMS quality management officers play a pivotal role in ensuring that every aspect of their organization's operations meets and exceeds established standards. In this era of data-driven healthcare, the importance of quality metrics cannot be overstated, as they provide the objective and evidence-based foundation upon which EMS systems can continually improve patient care, enhance operational efficiency, and demonstrate accountability to stakeholders. 

EMS quality metrics encompass a wide range of performance indicators, from response times to clinical care processes, from patient satisfaction to post-incident outcomes. These metrics serve as a comprehensive lens through which EMS organizations can evaluate their performance, identify areas for improvement, and make data-informed decisions. They go beyond mere compliance with regulatory requirements, as they reflect the commitment to delivering the highest possible level of care to patients during their most vulnerable moments. 

One of the fundamental reasons why EMS quality management officers need to vigilantly monitor these metrics is to ensure patient safety and optimize clinical outcomes. Patient care in the prehospital setting is time-sensitive and requires rapid decision-making. Metrics related to response times, for example, directly influence the timeliness of interventions, which can be life-saving in critical situations such as cardiac arrest or trauma. Additionally, metrics associated with clinical care quality, adherence to protocols, and medication administration accuracy directly impact patient outcomes, making them essential components of EMS quality management. Through continuous monitoring and analysis of these metrics, EMS organizations can detect variations, implement targeted interventions, and ultimately improve patient care, reducing morbidity and mortality rates.  

There is a key point of analysis in examining what we do. We implement systems and processes to improve patient outcomes and reduce death and disability for whatever emergency we are called to respond to. The outcomes movement in EMS clinical quality improvement revolves around focusing on patient outcomes as a measure of the quality of care provided. This approach marks a shift from process-driven metrics to outcome-driven ones. The outcomes movement draws from four techniques:  

• A greater reliance on standards and guidelines – standards and guidelines improve efficiencies of care, and level the playing field between individual EMTs and paramedics. Think of it as these are the things we do that we know work and this is how we implement them.  

• Routine and systematic interval measures of patient function and well-being, with disease-specific clinical outcomes – for example, survival to hospital discharge from cardiac arrest; patients who are neurologically intact after stroke; reductions in death and disability due to major trauma and STEMI. 

• Analysis of pooled clinical and outcome data is crucial to determining success for a given population. 

• Appropriate results from the data base analyzed and disseminated to meet the concerns of each decision-maker for every provider in the system.  

For any quality improvement initiative we implement we must examine at least one primary, hopefully a secondary, and perhaps a tertiary outcome parameter. We should also examine the cost impact of our endeavors. Some initiatives are for things we need to correct and require us to do nothing more than to make a change on paper, we do not have to buy equipment or train anyone. These are generally the easiest to implement because we are changing a process and they do not incur a cost. Sometimes we initiate something, blood transfusions, for example, to improve outcomes from major trauma. We may not be reimbursed for initiating a blood program, so this would be a financial loss, but the clinical outcome and improvement in survival cannot be disputed. We do it because it is the right thing to do, but we still need to analyze the cost. 

Five Essential Parameters 

The five essential parameters every EMS quality officer should monitor include: 

1. Response Time and Arrival at Scene: 
   1. Parameter: Response time, defined as the time from receiving the emergency call to the arrival of EMS personnel at the scene, is a fundamental metric. It directly impacts patient outcomes, especially in critical cases. 
   2. Rationale: Monitoring response times helps evaluate the efficiency of dispatch systems and ambulance deployment strategies. It ensures that EMS providers reach patients in a timely manner, which is critical for conditions like cardiac arrest or trauma. The time to start CPR; the time to application of an AED; the time to implementation of ACLS; and the response to the scene, on-scene time, and transport for major trauma patients; are all examples of time-dependent processes and functions that influence outcomes and survival. 
2. Patient Assessment and Documentation: 
   1. Parameter: Completeness and accuracy of patient assessments and documentation. 
   2. Rationale: Ensuring that EMS providers conduct thorough assessments and document them accurately is essential for continuity of care. Quality patient assessments help guide treatment decisions, improve handoffs to receiving facilities, and support quality improvement efforts. Patient assessment is the hardest part of the job for any EMT or paramedic. We can teach anyone to start an IV or even to intubate, but knowing when those interventions are required cannot be underestimated. Assessing our capabilities to provide accurate assessments is key to our process.
3. Clinical Care Quality: 
   1. Parameter: Adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines and protocols. 
   2. Rationale: Consistent and evidence-based care is vital for patient safety and outcomes. Monitoring compliance with clinical guidelines helps identify areas for improvement and ensures that patients receive the most effective treatments and interventions. Maintaining an airway and oxygenating your patient; controlling external bleeding and treatment of shock; 12 lead acquisition with the administration of nitroglycerin and aspirin are examples of essential components of clinical guidelines for cardiac and trauma patients.
4. Patient Satisfaction and Feedback: 
   1. Parameter: Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback mechanisms. 
   2. Rationale: Measuring patient satisfaction provides valuable insights into the patient experience and perceptions of care. It allows EMS systems to identify areas of improvement in communication, empathy, and overall service quality. Patient satisfaction cannot be ignored.
5. Clinical Outcomes and Post-Discharge Follow-up: 
   1. Parameter: Post-incident follow-up, hospital readmission rates, and patient outcomes. 
   2. Rationale: Assessing the impact of EMS interventions on patient outcomes, such as survival rates, functional status, and complications, is essential. This parameter helps evaluate the effectiveness of EMS care beyond the immediate prehospital phase and informs strategies for continuous improvement. Clinical outcomes help us determine if our interventions (processes) and the systems we have put into place are working. They let us know if we need to make improvements. Survival from cardiac arrest; reduced morbidity and mortality for trauma, STEMI, and stroke; reduced length of stay and survival for endotracheal intubation; are just some areas to focus on. 

Think about outcomes in this context: To this day many people view EMS as transport to the hospital, full stop. If crime increases in your community, they hold the police chief accountable. If fires increase, with increasing property damage, the public will become incensed. How would the public view EMS if we said that the provision of EMS in your community has resulted in a decrease in mortality and morbidity of 14% for patients with STEMI? Or that the Utstein cardiac arrest survival rate (to discharge) of patients who are neurologically intact with bystander CPR is 43%? This not only demonstrates high-quality clinical care but value to the community. When we need more ambulances and EMS teams to improve response times or increased public education to teach CPR we will have greater support at the community level. They will understand the value of having a well-sourced EMS program of care.

Additional Considerations: 

• System-wide Performance Metrics: Measuring system-wide metrics, such as ambulance availability, equipment readiness, and training compliance, ensures that the entire EMS system is operating at peak performance. 
• Documentation Accuracy: Beyond assessing the completeness of documentation, accuracy in documenting patient information, treatments administered, and response details is crucial for both patient care and legal compliance. 
• Medication Safety: Monitoring medication administration practices, including dosage accuracy and adherence to medication protocols, helps prevent errors and ensures patient safety. 
• Sentinel events: Monitoring, assessing, and rectifying outcomes from sentinel events. Monitoring sentinel events is a critical component of the quality assurance process in to identify systemic issues, improving patient safety, and enhancing quality of care. Monitoring sentinel events is integral to ensuring the highest standards of patient care and safety in EMS.  
• Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): We all have some type of quality assurance program. Quality assurance is where we are ensuring that we are meeting the minimum standards we have identified for our organization. Continuous quality improvement is the next step, where we apply the tools and techniques to continuously evaluate and improve processes within our organization, which includes everything from who we select to work for us, the clinical care we provide, to how we educate and train our staff. Establishing a robust CQI program that regularly reviews data, identifies trends, and implements improvement initiatives is essential for ongoing quality management. 
• Education and Training: Assessing the competence and developing competency of EMS providers through regular training evaluations, skills assessments, and certification compliance helps maintain high-quality care.  
• Compliance with Regulations and Standards: Ensuring adherence to local, state, and federal regulations, as well as industry standards, is fundamental to quality and legal compliance. 

The late Max Weill, MD, founder of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, a contemporary of the late Peter Safar, and one of the driving forces in how we resuscitate people who are in shock and cardiac arrest, famously said: “Performing CPR without measuring the effects is like flying an airplane without an altimeter.” This essential concept applies to everything we do, from the care of a patient at a single call all the way up to the entire system of care. 

Incorporating these quality parameters into an EMS system's performance evaluation and improvement efforts can contribute to better patient outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, and more effective and efficient delivery of prehospital care. It is essential to measure and analyze these parameters consistently to drive continuous quality improvement in EMS.

References: 

1. “Emergency Medical Services Systems Development. Lessons Learned from the United States of America for Developing Countries: Pan American Health Organization”, December 2003. Pan American Health Organization. 

2. Gerard D, “Competence and the EMS Dynamic” Ambulance Today Autumn 2017, Issue 3 Volume 14 UK Publication: http://bit.ly/2FfO36b 

3. Blumenthal D. Part I: Quality of care--What is it? N Engl J Med 1996;335:891-893.  

4. Blumenthal D. Part 4: The origins of the quality-of-care debate. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1146-1149. 

5. White K. Improved medical statistics and health services systems. Publ Health Rep 1967;82:847-854.  

6. Nelson E, Mohr J, Batalden P, Plume S. Improving health care, Part 1: The clinical value compass. Journal on Quality Improvement 1996;22:243-258.  

7. Ayanian JZ, Markel H. Donabedian’s Lasting Framework for Health Care Quality. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(3): 205–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605101. 

8. Berwick D, Fox DM. “Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care”: Donabedian’s Classic Article 50 Years Later. Milbank Q. 2016; 94(2): 237–41. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12189 

9. Berwick D, Fox DM. "Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care": Donabedian's Classic Article 50 Years Later. Milbank Q. 2016 Jun;94(2):237-41. 

10. Scott S. Polsky, Editor in Chief, Continuous Quality Improvement in EMS. (1993). American College of Emergency Physicians: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Limited. 

11. Robert A. Swor, Chief Editor. Quality Management in Prehospital Care. (1993). United Kingdom: Mosby Lifeline. 

12. Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Billi JE, Cabanas JG, Cone DC, Diercks DB, Foster JJ, Meeks RA, Travers AH, Welsford M. Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2) 

13. Principles of EMS Systems. (2006). United Kingdom: Jones and Bartlett. 

14. Sultz, H. A., Young, K. (2011). Health Care USA. United States: Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

15. Raffel, M.W., & Raffel, N.K. (1980). The U.S. health system: Origins and functions. 

16. Kron, T., Durbin, E. (1981). The Management of Patient Care: Putting Leadership Skills to Work. United Kingdom: Saunders. 

17. Friis, R. H., Sellers, T. A. (2009). Epidemiology for Public Health Practice. United Kingdom: Jones and Bartlett Publishers. 

18. Continuous Quality Improvement in Nursing. (1992). United States: American Nurses Pub. 

19. Behn, R. D. (2014). The PerformanceStat Potential: A Leadership Strategy for Producing Results. United States: Brookings Institution Press. 

20. Moore, L. (1999). Measuring quality and effectiveness of prehospital EMS. Prehospital Emergency Care, 3(4), 325-331. 

21. El Sayed, M. J. (2012). Measuring quality in emergency medical services: a review of clinical performance indicators. Emergency medicine international, 2012.