Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Peer Review

Peer Reviewed

Case Report

Endoscopic Endonasal Repair of Recurrent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak With Adipofascial Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap: Case Report and Review of Literature

Namra Qadeer, MBBS1; Babak J Mehrara, MD, FACS2; Marc Cohen, MD3; Viviane Tabar, MD4; Farooq Shahzad, MBBS, MS, FACS, FAAP2

August 2022
1937-5719
ePlasty 2022;22:e32

Abstract

Background. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks are the most common complication of endoscopic endonasal skull base tumor resection. The workhorse nasoseptal flap or other vascularized intranasal flaps may not be a viable option in patients who have previously undergone surgery or local radiation; in these cases, pericranial flaps may also be unavailable. Free flap reconstruction in patients undergoing endoscopic resection is challenging because of limited exposure. The transmaxillary approach has recently been reported for free flap reconstruction of these defects. This report describes a patient with a pituitary tumor who underwent craniotomy and resection of a pituitary mass via an endoscopic endonasal approach. Postoperatively, the patient developed a high flow cerebrospinal fluid leak that did not resolve with lumbar drain and attempts at endoscopic revision of nasoseptal flap. An adipofascial anterolateral thigh free flap was harvested, based on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels. An upper gingivobuccal sulcus incision was used to access the maxilla. Openings were created in the anterior and medial maxillary sinus to create a passage to the sphenoid sinus. The flap was inset into the defect via this transmaxillary channel. The pedicle was tunneled subcutaneously through the cheek to recipient facial vessels. The procedure resulted in complete resolution of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and pneumocephalus. Imaging at 18 months showed the flap in good position. This report describes the technique in detail along with a review of the current literature.

Introduction

Extended endoscopic endonasal surgery has revolutionized the resection of anterior skull base tumors. Compared with open surgery, this minimally invasive technique results in improved tumor visualization, higher rates of total resection, superior neurologic outcomes, and decreased length of hospital stay.1 Repair of the dura and cranial base defect is performed in a multilayered fashion with a variable combination of dural substitutes, sealants, acellular dermal matrix, fat and fascia autografts, and vascularized intranasal flaps.2 A risk of all approaches for resection of skull base tumors is postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Low-volume leaks may be successfully managed with lumbar drain placement; in contrast, high-volume leaks require reoperation for defect closure.3 In patients with prior surgery or a history of local radiation, dural defect repair with vascularized intranasal flaps may not be a viable option. Regional extranasal pedicled flaps are also usually limited by the arc of rotation into the cranial base. Free tissue transfer is challenging in these patients due to limited exposure and lack of external access incisions.

Although minimally invasive access methods for free flap reconstruction of the central cranial base via the maxilla or the neck have recently been described, there is still a paucity of these reports in the medical literature.4 They allow the flap and pedicle to be inset within the space confines of the endonasal approach. Here, we report a case of recalcitrant CSF leak that was repaired endoscopically with an anterolateral thigh adipofascial free flap. This technique is detailed along with a current review of literature.

Methods

A 53-year-old woman underwent emergency craniotomy at an outside institution for an extensive sellar mass extending into both frontal lobes and presenting with an intraparenchymal and ventricular hemorrhage. A subtotal resection was performed, and pathology was consistent with a pituitary adenoma. She presented to our institution 2 years later with complaints of worsening vision. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.5-cm sellar mass abutting the cavernous sinus and extending to the orbital apex with a large suprasellar and inferior frontal component. Tumor resection was performed via frontal craniotomy with the plan for a second stage for endoscopic resection. The patient underwent resection of the sellar component of the tumor via extended endoscopic endonasal trans sphenoid approach 9 months later. A high-flow CSF leak was noted during tumor resection, and therefore a lumbar drain was placed. The cranial base defect was reconstructed in a multilayered fashion using acellular dermal matrix, Duraseal (polyethylene glycol sealant), Surgicel (oxidized regenerated cellulose), and a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Merocel packing (hydroxylated polyvinyl acetate) was placed in both nasal passages for 3 days. However, the patient developed CSF rhinorrhea postoperatively, and the volume of CSF leak increased substantially with clamping of the lumbar drain. The anterior skull base was explored endoscopically, and egress of CSF was noted around the nasoseptal flap; the flap was reset and bolstered with a middle turbinate flap. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was also placed, especially because the patient had a history of significant intraventricular hemorrhage and dilated ventricles. This resulted in resolution of rhinorrhea. However, a follow-up computed tomography scan 10 days later showed significant frontal pneumocephalus. The patient was therefore readmitted and was started on antibiotics. A multidisciplinary discussion was held, and it was concluded that the best option for repair of the CSF leak was a vascularized flap.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Endoscopic view of anterior skull base defect. A neuropatty is in place on the cranial side.

The patient was taken to the operating room for endoscopic endonasal exploration of the anterior cranial base. The previously placed nasoseptal and middle turbinate flaps were partially nonviable and debrided. The acellular dermal matrix, sealants, and granulation tissue were removed. The cranial base defect was exposed and revealed a high-flow CSF leak (Figure 1).

An upper lip gingivobuccal sulcus incision was made. The anterior face of the maxilla was exposed subperiosteally up to the infraorbital nerve. Openings were made in the anterior maxillary wall, followed by the medial maxillary wall using osteotomes, Kerrison rongeurs, down-biting forceps, and drills. A corridor was thus created to the anterior skull base. The facial vessels were accessed via a submandibular incision 2 cm below the mandibular border. A subcutaneous tunnel through the cheek was made from the facial vessels to the gingivobuccal sulcus incision. Hemostasis was assured in the tunnel.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Anterolateral thigh adipofascial free flap.

An anterolateral thigh free flap was harvested. This fasciocutaneous flap is based on the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, which is a branch of the profunda femoris artery.5 A single fascial perforator was incorporated in the flap. The skin paddle was discarded, leaving an adipofascial flap 4 x 30 cm in size (Figure 2). The superficial surface of the pedicle was marked for orientation.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the surgical procedure.

The flap was introduced through the gingivobuccal sulcus incision and passed through the anterior and medial maxillectomies into the posterior nasopharynx (Figure 3). The pedicle was passed from the gingivobuccal sulcus incision to the neck incision via the subcutaneous cheek tunnel. A Penrose drain was used for pedicle delivery through the cheek, and the previously placed orientation marks were used to ensure that the pedicle was not twisted. Microsurgical anastomosis was performed between the facial vessels and the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral vessels. A piece of fat was placed behind the pedicle to prevent kinking of the vessels as they transitioned from their subcutaneous location to the deeper plane in the neck.

Flap inset was performed endonasally. Acellular dermal matrix was placed as an onlay on the cranial side of the defect. TISSEEL (fibrin sealant) was sprayed over the defect. The flap was then placed over the defect. Flap pliability allowed tight packing and complete obliteration of the sphenoid sinus. A red rubber catheter was placed in the nasal cavity to provide support to the flap. A nasal trumpet was placed in the contralateral nasal passage to keep the airway open. Gingivobuccal sulcus and neck incisions were closed. The patient underwent an immediate postoperative computed tomography scan that showed significant decrease in the volume of the pneumocephalus.

Results

Figure 4
Figure 4. Axial and coronal magnetic resonance imaging at 18 months showing vascularized flap in the anterior skull base.

The postoperative course was unremarkable. The CSF rhinorrhea resolved, and the patient was discharged home 1 week later. Follow-up endoscopy at 10 months showed viable flap. Magnetic resonance imaging at 18 months showed the presence of a vascularized flap in the anterior skull base (Figure 4). Final pathology was consistent with a silent corticotroph adenoma.

Discussion

Endoscopic endonasal approaches are increasingly used for anterior skull base surgery. As the indications of this technique have expanded, so have the complexity of cases and the size of defects.1 Reconstruction of the anterior cranial base is typically undertaken in a multilayered fashion using combinations of autologous fat or fascia grafts, acellular dermal matrix, and vascularized intranasal flaps.1,2 In high-flow CSF defects, repair with vascularized intranasal local flaps significantly decreases the incidence of CSF leaks.2 A recent meta-analysis showed that the overall leak rate after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is 7.2% but varies dramatically depending on the size of the pathology, location, size of defect, and whether the case is primary.6 This risk is increased by an intraoperative CSF leak, larger size of the defect, obesity, certain tumors, posterior fossa defects, and perioperative radiation.1,2,6,7 CSF leaks can be morbid as they may lead to meningitis, tension pneumocephalus, and hydrocephalus. Low-flow leaks may resolve with bed rest and CSF diversion with a lumbar drain. High-flow leaks almost always require surgical repair with grafts and intranasal flaps, most commonly a nasoseptal flap.8 Other available flaps include the middle turbinate, inferior turbinate, and lateral nasal wall mucoperiosteal flaps.1 However, in case of recalcitrant leaks requiring repeat operations, intranasal flaps options may be inadequate or even not available in patients who have undergone prior resections. Regional pedicled flaps that can reach the central cranial base include pericranial flaps and the temporoparietal fascia flap.9,10 However, pericranial flaps may not reach posterior cranial base defects, and their blood supply may be tenuous in patients who have previously undergone craniotomy.11 The temporoparietal fascia flap has its pivot point at the lateral skull base, resulting in the most distal and least perfused part of the flap covering the defect. Therefore, in recurrent high-flow CSF leaks, free flaps can provide well-vascularized tissue for salvage reconstruction of anterior skull base defects. Free flaps are especially useful in patients with previous radiation, as local tissues vascularity is compromised.

The major challenge with free flap reconstruction of the cranial base is the extremely limited access provided by the endoscopic endonasal approach. There is very little space for flap manipulation. Furthermore, there is no corridor to the neck recipient vessels. Two techniques have been described for free flap reconstruction via the endonasal route: the transmaxillary and the transcervical approaches.12-20 The transmaxillary approach is described in detail above. In the transcervical approach, a neck incision is made to create a passage to the skull base via the parapharyngeal or prevertebral/retropharyngeal space.4 Dissection is then carried in this space up to the skull base defect. The flap pedicle is passed through this transcervical access to the neck, and the flap is inset endonasally. This technique is advantageous for large flaps that would be difficult to pass through the transmaxillary route. Table 1 is a summary of the published reports of free flap reconstruction of the skull base in conjunction with endoscopic endonasal approaches.

The adipofascial anterolateral thigh flap has several advantages compared with other flap types. It has a long pedicle that can easily reach the neck and has a good size match with facial vessels. The donor site is very favorable in terms of morbidity. Adipofascial flaps have a robust blood flow, are easily trimmed, and are pliable, thus facilitating passage of the flap atraumatically using endoscopic instruments.16 In contrast, muscle flaps tend to be bulkier, thus complicating transnasal passage.12 Omentum flaps have been used for intracranial repairs; however, this flap is somewhat flimsy and may be difficult to manipulate atraumatically with endoscopic instruments.21

There are very few reports of the transmaxillary approach for cranial base reconstruction (Table 1). This report adds to the body of literature and affirms the effectiveness of this technique.

Table 1: Reports of endoscopic inset of free flaps in the anterior skull base in the current literature

 

Acknowledgments

Affiliations: 1Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; 2Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer, New York, NY; 3Head and Neck Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer, New York, NY; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer, New York, NY

Correspondence: Farooq Shahzad, MBBS, MS, FACS, FAAP; shahzadf@mskcc.org

Funding: This research was funded in part through National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Disclosures: None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this manuscript.

References

1. Hannan CJ, Kelleher E, Javadpour M. Methods of skull base repair following endoscopic endonasal tumor resection: a review. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1614. Published 2020 Aug 11. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01614

2. Cai X, Yang J, Zhu J, et al. Reconstruction strategies for intraoperative CSF leak in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jan 21]. Br J Neurosurg. 2021;1-11. doi:10.1080/02688697.2020.1849548

3. Patel MR, Stadler ME, Snyderman CH, et al. How to choose? Endoscopic skull base reconstructive options and limitations. Skull Base. 2010;20(6):397-404. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1253573

4. Dang RP, Roland LT, Sharon JD, Doering M, Chicoine MR, Pipkorn P. Pedicle corridors and vessel options for free flap reconstruction following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;82(2):196-201. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1695001

5. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7):2219-2230. doi:10.1097/00006534-200206000-00007

6. Kim JS, Hong SD. Risk factors for postoperative CSF leakage after endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Rhinology. 2021;59(1):10-20. doi:10.4193/Rhin20.145

7. Jalisi S, O'Gara B, Toshkezi G, Chin L. Local vascularized flap reconstruction of the skull base—clinical outcomes and analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(1):87-92. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2012.11.073

8. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(10):1882-1886. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000234933.37779.e4

9. Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM. Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(1):13-18. doi:10.1002/lary.20022

10. Rastatter JC, Walz PC, Alden TD. Pediatric skull base reconstruction: case report of a tunneled temporoparietal fascia flap. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(3):371-377. doi:10.3171/2015.6.PEDS1588

11. DE Andrade EJ, Almeida JP, Borghei-Razavi H, et al. Reconstruction after extended endonasal approaches to the anterior cranial base: surgical techniques and current results. J Neurosurg Sci. 2021;65(2):151-159. doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.20.05087-0

12. Kang SY, Eskander A, Hachem RA, et al. Salvage skull base reconstruction in the endoscopic era: Vastus lateralis free tissue transfer. Head Neck. 2018;40(4):E45-E52. doi:10.1002/hed.25094

13. Hackman TG. Endoscopic adipofascial radial forearm flap reconstruction of a clival defect. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(11):e1109. Published 2016 Nov 23. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001109

14. Sagheer SH, Swendseid B, Evans J, et al. Free tissue transfer for central skull base defect reconstruction: Case series and surgical technique. Oral Oncol. 2021;115:105220. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105220

15. Krane NA, Troob SH, Wax MK. Combined endoscopic and transcervical approach for free flap reconstruction of nasopharyngeal and clival defects: A case report. Microsurgery. 2019;39(3):259-262. doi:10.1002/micr.30363

16. Rodriguez-Lorenzo A, Driessen C, Mani M, Lidian A, Gudjonsson O, Stigare E. Endoscopic assisted insetting of free flaps in anterior skull base reconstruction: A preliminary report of five cases. Microsurgery. 2020;40(4):460-467. doi:10.1002/micr.30542

17. Chapchay K, Weinberger J, Eliashar R, Adler N. Anterior skull base reconstruction following ablative surgery for osteoradionecrosis: case report and review of literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(12):1134-1140. doi:10.1177/0003489419865558

18. Moy JD, Gardner PA, Sridharan S, Wang EW. Radial forearm free tissue transfer to clival defect. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80(Suppl 4):S380-S381. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1700890

19. Vieira S, Nabil A, Maza G, et al. Salvage free tissue transfer for clival osteoradionecrosis after repeat proton beam therapy. World Neurosurg. 2020;138:485-490. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.108

20. Sinha P, Desai SC, Ha DH, Chicoine MR, Haughey BH. Extracranial radial forearm free flap closure of refractory cerebrospinal fluid leaks: a novel hybrid transantral-endoscopic approach. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2 Suppl Operative):ons219-ons226. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182684ac8

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement