ADVERTISEMENT
Coincidence of Brachial Plexus Upper Trunk and Long Thoracic Nerve Injuries in 50 Patients With Winged Scapula: Improvements in Shoulder Stability and Functional Movements After Decompression and Neurolysis
© 2024 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved.
Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of ePlasty or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.
Abstract
Background. Injuries to the long thoracic nerve (LTN) and upper trunk of the brachial plexus (UTBP) can occur simultaneously and cause scapular winging and shoulder instability. The literature has not documented the concurrent occurrence of UTBP and LTN injuries in these patients. We show an upper trunk injury in patients whose preoperative electromyography (EMG) did not show injury to the UTBP.
Methods. We screened patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries and associated nerve injuries and identified 50 patients (29 men and 21 women; 31 right side and 19 left side; mean age 34 years, range 16-63 years) with winged scapula and shoulder instability who had undergone neurolysis and decompression of the UTBP and LTN with the lead author and surgeon, R.K.N. We measured and compared the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) of the upper limb nerves before and after neurolysis during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) and compared it with surgical outcomes.
Results. After surgery, IONM showed a significant increase in CMAPs for all 4 muscles: serratus anterior (295 ± 291 to 886 ± 937), supraspinatus (237 ± 216 to 618 ± 423), deltoid (344 ± 446 to 936 ± 1015), and biceps (492 ± 656 to 1109 ± 1230, P < .0001). The CMAPs of the 4 upper extremity (UE) muscles showed a positive correlation before and after surgery (R = 0.6, 0.28, 0.59, 0.57, respectively; P < .0001). Preoperatively, all patients had severe to moderate scapular winging and 15° - <170° in active range of motion (shoulder forward flexion and abduction). Scapular winging, shoulder flexion, and abduction improved significantly in 98% (n = 49) of the patients with a postoperative average of 168° ± 11° and 165° ± 16°, respectively, compared with the preoperative average of 127° ± 30° and 122° ± 29°, respectively, (P < .0001) with a mean follow-up of 1.3 years. Postoperatively, no patient experienced a worsening of their preoperative symptoms.
Conclusions. Our article presents the first documented occurrence of a long thoracic nerve injury coinciding with a brachial plexus upper trunk lesion in 50 patients with scapular winging whose preoperative EMG did not show injury to the UTBP. Neurolysis of the UTBP and LTN immediately increased the nerve conduction to the UE muscles evaluated intraoperatively.
Introduction
Injuries to the long thoracic nerve (LTN) and upper trunk of the brachial plexus (UTBP) can occur simultaneously and cause scapular winging and shoulder instability. The literature has not documented the concurrent occurrence of UTBP and LTN injuries in these patients. Based on the lead author's (R.K.N.) extensive experience with thousands of patients with brachial plexus and associated nerve injuries,1-4 we have observed, using intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM), that patients with scapular winging and shoulder dysfunction often experience simultaneous injuries to both UTBP and the LTN in the supraclavicular region because of their close anatomical proximity. The LTN arises from the upper portion of the cervical nerve roots C5, C6, and C7 of the brachial plexus. The diagnosis of winging scapula (WS) can be challenging.5 Most of the WS patients (87%)6 reported in the literature have medial winging due to LTN injury, serratus anterior muscle weakness, shoulder instability, and upper extremity (UE) functional disabilities.1-9
In most WS patients, heavy weightlifting, sports, and recreationally related intense physical activities1-4,10-14 appeared to cause injuries when the contractions of the middle scalene muscle directly compressed the UTBP and the LTN. IONM is used to assess the nerve's functions and monitor the immediate results of decompression and neurolysis, and it can predict surgical outcomes.15 Our study reports the first documented coincidence of UTBP and LTN injuries in patients with scapular winging and shoulder dysfunction. We show an upper trunk injury in patients whose preoperative electromyography (EMG) did not show injury to the UTBP.
Furthermore, we report that neurolysis of the UTBP and LTN immediately increases the nerve conduction in 4 UE muscles assessed intraoperatively, improving shoulder functions and decreasing the scapular winging with an average follow-up of 1.3 years after surgery.
Methods and Materials
We screened patients with traumatic brachial plexus and associated nerve injuries. The patient assessment included the demographics (sex, age) and medical history of all patients in this report. We identified 50 patients (29 men and 21 women; 31 right side and 19 left side; mean age 34 years, range 16–63 years) with winged scapula and decreased shoulder movements who had neurolysis of the UTBP and LTN with the lead author and surgeon, R.K.N. Patients also had follow-up evaluations after surgery (a mean of 1.3 years; range 0.2 to 4.6 years) (Table 1). Pre- and intraoperative EMG, nerve conduction velocity, and the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) were measured for all 50 patients in this report. Winging of the scapula occurs in movements of forward elevation and abduction. On physical examination, severe WS is evident; however, mild to moderate WS patients are evaluated while they flex their arms horizontally and perform a wall push-up. Measurement of WS score and shoulder movements and surgeries were performed as reported in our previous publications (Figure 1).1,2,4
Table 1: Patient Demographics and Improvements After Decompression and Neurolysis in 50 Patients With Scapular Winging and Decreased Shoulder Movements. M, male; F, female; L, left; R, right; ESW, extent of scapular winging.
Figure 1 illustrates the 4 classifications used to assess the extent of scapular winging (ESW): 1 denotes severe, 2 moderate, 3 mild, and 4 minimal/normal.
Statistical analyses
Excel 2013 was used to analyze and create graphs from descriptive statistical data. A student t test was used to assess whether the surgical improvement was statistically significant compared with the preoperative data. P values ≤.05 were considered significant.
We examined the association between the following parameters using the Pearson correlation coefficient: time to surgery and pre-and postoperative extent of scapular winging (ESW); time to surgery and pre-and postoperative active range of motion (AROM); pre- and postoperative ESW; pre- and postoperative AROM; follow-up time and postoperative ESW; follow-up time and postoperative AROM; and pre-and intraoperative CMAPs of the UE nerves tested.
Results
All 50 patients in this report showed evidence of UTBP injury with biceps muscle strength scores of M3 or 4/5 before surgery. After surgery, IONM results showed a significant increase in CMAPs for all 4 muscles: serratus anterior (295 ± 291 to 886 ± 937), supraspinatus (237 ± 216 to 618 ± 423), deltoid (344 ± 446 to 936 ± 1015), and biceps (492 ± 656 to 1109 ± 1230, P < .0001; Figures 2-5). There was a strong correlation between the CMAPs of the 4 UE muscles before and after surgery (R = 0.6, 0.28, 0.59, 0.57, respectively; P < .0001; Table 2). Preoperatively, 28 patients (56%) had severe, 20 (40%) had moderate, and 2 (4%) had mild scapular winging. Postoperatively, scapular winging, shoulder flexion, and abduction improved significantly in 98% (n = 49) of the patients after an average surgical follow-up of 1.3 (range 0.2–4.6) years (Figure 6). All patients had below 170° (15° - <170°) AROM preoperatively. Postoperatively, AROM (forward flexion and abduction at the shoulder) improved significantly (mean 168° ± 11° and 165° ± 16°, respectively) compared with the preoperative mean of 127° ± 30° and 122° ± 29°, respectively (P < .0001; Figures 7–9).
Figure 2. Demonstrates a significant improvement in CMAPs of the serratus anterior following surgery during IONM (886 ± 937; P < .0001) when compared with the CMAPs (295 ± 291) before surgery.
Figure 3. Shows a significant improvement in the supraspinatus CMAPs following surgery during IONM (618 ± 423; P <.0001) when compared with the CMAPs (237 ± 216) before surgery.
Figure 4. Shows a significant improvement in the deltoid CMAPs after surgery during IONM (936 ± 1015; P <.0001) when compared with the CMAPs before surgery (344 ± 446).
Figure 5. Demonstrates a significant improvement in CMAPs of the biceps after surgery during IONM (1109 ± 1230; P < .0001) when compared with the CMAPs (492 ± 656) before surgery.
Table 2: Pearson Correlation Data.
Figure 6. Demonstrates a significant improvement in scapular winging in 50 scapulas with severe to moderate winging before surgery. After a mean follow-up of 1.3 years, the average preoperative ESW score improved to 3.3 ± 0.8 (P < .0001), which was 1.5 ± 0.6 before surgery.
Figure 7. Indicates the surgical result of ESW and the time to injury do not significantly correlate (R = 0.02, P =.3).
Figure 8. Displays a linear association between pre- and postoperative shoulder forward flexion (R = 0.3, P < .0001). The overall improvement in shoulder flexion (mean 168° ± 11°) after surgery was statistically significant compared with the preoperative mean of 127° ± 30° (P < .0001).
Figure 9. Depicts a linear association between pre- and postoperative shoulder abduction (R = 0.54, P < .001). The postoperative shoulder abduction (mean 165° ± 16°) was statistically significant compared with the preoperative mean of 122° ± 29° (P < 0.0001).
The relationship between the surgical outcomes and surgery delay was not significant (R = 0.02, P < .3; Table 2). Follow-up time was weakly associated with the surgical outcomes of ESW (R = -0.2) and AROM (R = 0.12; P < .001). The association between the CMAPs of all 4 muscles evaluated during IONM before and after surgery was moderate to strong: serratus anterior (R = 0.6), supraspinatus (R = 0.28), deltoid (R= 0.57), and biceps (R = 0.59; P < .001; Table 2)
Figure 10. A 29-year-old male patient with moderate WS and decreased shoulder AROM (shoulder flexion and abduction, 15° and 50°, respectively). (A) Preoperative image. (B) Postoperative image 3 months after surgery. Postoperative image shows a fully corrected scapula, no winging, and complete overhead movements of 180°.
Figure 11. A 34-year-old female patient with (A) severe scapular winging and (B) decreased shoulder abduction before surgery. Four months after surgery, the patient recovered (C) a normal scapula and (D)180° of shoulder abduction.
After surgery, no patient experienced a worsening of their preoperative symptoms.
Discussion
Patients with winged scapula and decreased shoulder functional movements due to UTBP and LTN injuries can result in permanent impairment with pain that can limit patients' quality of life and daily tasks if untreated.1,9 These patients have considerable difficulty and pain in abducting and flexing the arm at shoulder level.1,2 In addition, severe scapular winging gives an abnormal shoulder appearance and posture, resulting in permanent cosmetic defects. Injuries can occur due to accidents/falls (acute) or repetitive overuse (chronic).10 Weightlifting or intense physical activity11,14 was the cause of injury in 18 of 50 patients among the 10 causes in this report. Chronic compression and pressure on the nerve can damage the endoneurial capillaries and cause intraneural edema,16 which leads to axonal demyelination and malfunction of the internodal ion channels,17 and neural cell structures,18 followed by undesirable remyelination. Further, this impairs the transport of signaling molecules, thereby blocking the stimulation of muscle contraction.18
Nonsurgical interventions such as physical therapy, bracing, and pain control have been suggested to alleviate symptoms and maintain shoulder function.9,12,13,19 However, no conservative management is universally accepted and effective.9,20 Studies investigating bracing therapy19 have reported conflicting results and low patient compliance. Early detection and treatment can prevent a substantial loss of activity time or recurrence.21 Timely referrals are essential for patients who require surgical management, as muscles undergo atrophy if treatment is delayed.21 Early surgical intervention can result in a functional return.22-27 In stubborn, symptomatic WS patients, late surgical alternatives such as arthrodesis, tendon, and free muscle transfers are critical.26 -29 According to recent findings from the Monte Carlo Stimulation,30 indirect costs may be reduced if surgery and other interventions maximize patients' ability to return to work after severe brachial plexus and accessory nerve injuries.31
Neurolysis and surgical decompression are simpler, more physiologic, and less morbid than other surgeries, such as scapulothoracic fusion or pectoralis to scapula tendon transfers.2 These nerve procedures relieve the source of nerve constriction, subsequently improving Na+/K+ ATPase activity and the action potentials to regenerate,17 allowing the nerve to restore muscle function rapidly.2,18 Rapid functional recovery after decompression and neurolysis has been demonstrated.2,32 Burton et al32 recently reported that patients with prominent scapular winging and pain recovered near-complete symptom-free, significantly improved function and returned to regular activity 3 months after decompression and neurolysis. Klifto and Dellon33,34 have successfully demonstrated alleviating pain after neurolysis in diabetic patients.
Our present study is the first to report that decompression and neurolysis of the UTBP, in addition to the LTN, provide motor recovery to all 4 UE muscles (supraspinatus, biceps, deltoid, and serratus anterior) tested by IONM and significantly decreased WS and improved shoulder functional movements after a mean follow-up of 1.3 years. Reduced CMAP of the 4 UE muscles examined before surgery shows these patients had not only injuries to the LTN but also to the UTBP. CMAP decrease of 50% relates to muscle strength scores less than 3/5.35
IONM monitors the immediate effects of neurolysis and predicts surgical outcomes based on CMAP results.36,37 Alon and Riohkind36,37 have demonstrated a significant improvement in CMAPs between the onset and completion of external and interfascicular neurolysis in peripheral-nerve injuries (PNIs). PNI is one of the most frequent complications during surgeries, yet the occurrence of PNI is low in studies that measure nerve conduction (CMAP) during surgeries.17,36-38.
Typically, early nerve surgery is shown to provide a better outcome. However, studies have shown39 no correlation between surgery delays and postoperative shoulder functional outcomes in nerve injury patients. Since the relationship between the time to surgery and the CMAPs during IONM was neutral and not significantly associated with the 4 UE muscles tested, 9 of our patients in this report who had significant functional deficits that had persisted for over 6 years improved remarkably after surgery. The duration of injury and the length of follow-up time had no significant impact on the surgical outcomes, as we and other investigators demonstrated that decompression and neurolysis rapidly improved shoulder functional movements.2,32 A significant improvement in shoulder abduction was shown in WS patients who had neurolysis compared to nerve-grafting.40 The effectiveness and low morbidity of nerve surgery make it the treatment of choice.
Conclusions
Our article presents the first documented occurrence of a long thoracic nerve injury coinciding with a brachial plexus upper trunk lesion in 50 patients with scapular winging whose preoperative EMG did not show injury to the UTBP. Neurolysis and decompression of the LTN and UTBP immediately increased the nerve conduction to the UE muscles assessed intraoperatively. In addition, UE functional movements improved, and scapular winging decreased in 98% of the patients in a mean follow-up of 1.3 years.
Acknowledgments
Authors: Rahul K. Nath, MD; Chandra Somasundaram, PhD
Affiliation: Texas Nerve and Paralysis Institute, Houston, Texas
Correspondence: Rahul K. Nath, MD; rnath@drnathmedical.com
We thank the patients and their families who participated in this study.
Ethics: Patients were treated ethically in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Documented informed consent was obtained for all patients. The patient provided written consent to use the images in this report.
Disclosures: The authors disclose no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests.
References
1. Nath RK, Lyons AB, Bietz G. Microneurolysis and decompression of long thoracic nerve injury are effective in reversing scapular winging: long-term results in 50 cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Mar 7:8:25. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-25
2. Nath RK, Melcher SE. Rapid recovery of serratus anterior muscle function after microneurolysis of long thoracic nerve injury. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2007;9:2:4. doi:10.1186/1749-7221-2-4
3. Nath RK, Bowen ME, Eichhorn MG. Pressure-specified sensory device versus electrodiagnostic testing in brachial plexus upper trunk injury. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010;26(4):235-242. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1248231
4. Nath RK, Somasundaram C. Incidence, etiology, and management of long thoracic and accessory nerve injuries and winging scapula. Eplasty. 2021 Nov 11;21:e11.
5. Srikumaran U, Wells JH, Freehill MT, Tan EW, Higgins LD, Warner JJ. Scapular winging: a great masquerader of shoulder Disorders: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(14):e122. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01031
6. Seror P, Lenglet T, Nguyen C, Ouaknine M, Lefevre-Colau MM. Unilateral winged scapula: clinical and electrodiagnostic experience with 128 cases, with special attention to long thoracic nerve palsy. Muscle Nerve. 2018;57(6):913-920. doi:10.1002/mus.26059
7. Disa JJ, Wang B, Dellon AL. Correction of scapular winging by supraclavicular neurolysis of the long thoracic nerve. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2001;17(2):79-84. doi:10.1055/s-2001-12694
8. Martin RM, Fish DE. Scapular winging: anatomical review, diagnosis, and treatments. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008;1:1-11. doi:10.1007/s12178-007-9000-5
9. Meininger AK, Figuerres BF, Goldberg BA. Scapular winging: an update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Aug;19(8):453-462. doi:10.5435/00124635-201108000-00001
10. Llopis E, Restrepo R, Kassarjian A, Cerezal L. Overuse injuries of the wrist. Radiol Clin North Am. 2019;57(5):957-976.
11. Maak TG, Osei D, Delos D, Taylor S, Warren RF, Weiland AJ. Peripheral nerve injuries in sports-related surgery: presentation, evaluation, and management: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94: e121. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.01448
12. Mah JY, Otsuka NY. Scapular winging in young athletes. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992 Mar-Apr;12:245-247.
13. Schultz JS, Leonard JA, Jr. Long thoracic neuropathy from athletic activity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:87-90.
14. Berthold JB, Burg TM, Nussbaum RP. Long thoracic nerve injury caused by overhead weightlifting leading to scapular dyskinesis and medial scapular winging. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2017;117(2):133-137. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2017.025
15. Slimp JC. Intraoperative monitoring of nerve repairs. Hand Clin. 2000 Feb;16:25-36.
16. Rempel DM, Diao E. Entrapment neuropathies: pathophysiology and pathogenesis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):71-75. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2003.09.009
17. Yan JG, Eldridge MP, Dzwierzynski WW, et al. Intraoperative electrophysiological studies to predict the efficacy of neurolysis after nerve injury-experiment in rats. Hand (N Y). 2008 Sept;3(3):257-262. doi:10.1007/s11552-008-9094-2
18. Dahlin LB, Archer DR, McLean WG. Axonal transport and morphological changes following nerve compression. An experimental study in the rabbit vagus nerve. J Hand Surg Br. 1993;18(1):106-110. doi:10.1016/0266-7681(93)90206-u
19. Vastamäki M, Pikkarainen V, Vastamäki H, Ristolainen L. Scapular bracing is effective in some patients but symptoms persist in many despite bracing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(8):2650-2657. doi:10.1007/s11999-015-4310-1
20. Gooding BW, Geoghegan JM, Wallace WA, Manning PA. Scapular winging. Shoulder Elbow. 2014;6(1):4-11. doi:10.1111/sae.12033
21. Dahlin LB. Nerve injury and repair: from molecule to man. In: Slutsky DJ, Hentz VR, eds. Peripheral nerve surgery: practical applications in the upper extremity. Churchill Livingston, Elsevier 2006:1-22.
22. Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Surgical treatment of long thoracic nerve palsy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(5):1643-1645. doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03372-0
23. Roulet S, Bernier D, Le Nail LR, et al. Neurolysis of the distal segment of the long thoracic nerve for the treatment of scapular winging due to serratus anterior palsy: a continuous series of 73 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(10):2140-2146. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.039
24. Maire N, Abane L, Kempf JF, Clavert P; French Society for Shoulder and Elbow SOFEC. Long thoracic nerve release for scapular winging: clinical study of a continuous series of eight patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(6 Suppl): S329-S335. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.07.010
25. Tomaino MM. Neurophysiologic and clinical outcome following medial pectoral to long thoracic nerve transfer for scapular winging: a case report. Microsurgery. 2002; 22:254-257. doi:10.1002/micr.10046
26. Nath RK, Somasundaram C. Meta-analysis of long thoracic nerve decompression and neurolysis versus muscle and tendon transfer operative treatments of winging scapula. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1481. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001481
27. Lafosse T, D'Utruy A, El Hassan B, Grandjean A, Bouyer M, Masmejean E. Scapula alata: diagnosis and treatment by nerve surgery and tendon transfers. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022 Feb; 41S:S44-S53. doi:10.1016/j.hansur.2020.09.016
28. Geurkink TH, Gacaferi H, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Schoones JW, de Groot JH, Nagels J, Nelissen RGHH. Treatment of neurogenic scapular winging: a systematic review on outcomes after nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):e35-e47. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.009
29. Streit JJ, Lenarz CJ, Shishani Y, et al. Pectoralis major tendon transfer for the treatment of scapular winging due to long thoracic nerve palsy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:685-690. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.025
30. Dy CJ, Lingampalli N, Peacock K, Olsen MA, Ray WZ, Brogan DM. Direct cost of surgically treated adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020;2(2):77-79. doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.12.001.
31. Hong TS, Tian A, Sachar R, Ray WZ, Brogan DM, Dy CJ. Indirect cost of traumatic brachial plexus injuries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):e80. doi:10.2106/JBJS.18.00658
32. Burton JS, Mackinnon SE, McKee PB 4th, Henderson KM, Goestenkors DM, Thompson RW. Rapid functional recovery after thoracic outlet decompression in a series of adolescent athletes with chronic atraumatic shoulder-girdle pain, scapular winging/dyskinesis, and normal electrodiagnostic studies. Hand (N Y). 2023 Jul 3115589447231187088. doi:10.1177/15589447231187088
33. Klifto KM, Dellon AL. Neurolysis of the dorsal nerve to the penis to restore function after trauma. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84:307-311. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002144
34. Dellon AL. Surgical treatment of upper extremity pain. Hand Clin. 2016 Feb;32(1):71-80. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2015.08.008
35. Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel R, Kline DG. Management and outcomes in 353 surgically treated sciatic nerve lesions. J Neurosurg. 2004;01:8-17. doi:10.3171/jns.2004.101.1.0008
36. Alon M, Rochkind S. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative electrophysiologic analysis of the recovery of old injuries of the peripheral nerve and brachial plexus after microsurgical management. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18(2):77-82. doi:10.1055/s-2002-19885
37. Rochkind S, Alon M. Microsurgical management of old injuries of the peripheral nerve and brachial plexus. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;16(7):541-546. doi:10.1055/s-2000-8392
38. Birch R, Bonney GWL, Wynn Parry CB. Surgical disorders of the peripheral nerves. Churchill Livingstone; 1998:539.
39. Camp SJ, Birch R. Injuries to the spinal accessory nerve: a lesson to surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(1):62-67. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.24202
40. Göransson H, Leppänen OV, Vastamäki M. Patient outcome after surgical management of the spinal accessory nerve injury: a long-term follow-up study. SAGE Open Med. 2016;21;4:2050312116645731. doi:10.1177/2050312116645731