ADVERTISEMENT
Versatility of the Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap: The Four Seasons Flap
Versatility of the Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap: The Four Seasons Flap | |
,a ,b ,a ,a ,a a | |
aDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; and bUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK | |
Correspondence: mdicandia@doctors.net.uk |
Presented at the following academic meetings: ○ 56th Meeting of the Italian Society of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (SICPRE) Fasano (Brindisi), Italy, September 26-29, 2007 ○ 42nd Meeting of the European Society for Surgical Research (ESSR), Warsaw, Poland, May 21-24, 2008 ○ Winter Meeting, British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons, (BAPRAS) London, December 1-3, 2009 Background: The anterolateral free flap has become increasingly popular at our institution year on year. We decided to review our experience with this flap and study the reasons for this trend. Methods: A retrospective review of all anterolateral thigh free flaps performed at Addenbrooke's University Hospital from the available charts was carried out. This chart review included patients' demographics, indications, flap size, recipient vessels used, ischemia time, flap, and donor site outcomes. All flap perforator vessels were located preoperatively using a handheld Doppler ultrasound probe. Results: From October 1999 to December 2008, 55 anterolateral thigh flaps were performed in 55 patients to reconstruct a variety of soft-tissue defects (upper and lower limbs, chest wall, skull base, head and neck). Flap size ranged 12 to 35 cm in length and 4 to 11 cm in width. During flap elevation, the main supply to the flap was found to be a direct septocutaneous perforator in 41% (n = 23) of the cases as opposed to a musculocutaneous perforator, which was found in 59% (n = 32). The mean ischemia time was 82 minutes (range, 62-103). The overall flap success rate was 100%. Two flaps were successfully salvaged after reexploration for venous congestion. The donor site morbidity was minimal. The mean follow-up time was 18 months (range, 2-48). Discussion and Conclusion: The anterolateral thigh free flap was found to be a very reliable flap (100% success) across a wide range of clinical indications. It facilitates microvascular anastomoses as evidenced by the short ischemia time. It provided ample skin with volume that could be tailored to the defect. These advantages have led to its widespread use by different consultants and trainees in our department. |
Since its description by Song and colleagues in 19841 and elucidation of its vascular anatomy by Cormack and Lamberty2,3 the anterolateral thigh free flap has become a popular flap in Asia,4-9 but its adoption in the West has been relatively slow.10-12
The use of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap has been well described for reconstruction of defects of the head and neck,7,8,13-16 lower extremities,17-19 upper limbs,20-22 breast,23,24 and trunk.7,25,26 The large skin island, easy microsurgery, reliability, and versatility (skin, fat, muscle) have combined to make it one of the preferred flap choices for soft-tissue defect reconstruction.27-29
It is a reliable flap that supplies a large area of skin, it can be harvested as either a septum-cutaneous or a muscle-cutaneous flap, and the thickness and volume can be adjusted to match the defect. Therefore, it can replace most soft-tissue free flaps in most clinical situations.
There are few papers, which have evaluated its overall usefulness or versatility for a variety of different tissue defects and none of these have been in Western populations.27-30 Since the arrival of new consultants at our institution, it was noted that the applications of the ALT in our unit had widened.
We thereby decided to review our 16-year experience with 49 ALT flaps used for a variety of soft-tissue defects and highlight the reasons for its versatility and benefits.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A retrospective study of all patients undergoing free ALT flap reconstruction at Addenbrooke's University Hospital between October 1992 to December 2008 was carried out. Patients were identified by a manual search of the operating theater records and cross-referenced with the consultants' logbooks. Case notes were searched for demographic information, pathologic diagnosis, defect location, flap size, flap anatomy, technique of flap harvest, receipt vessels used, ischemia time, flap outcome, and donor site complications.
Flap planning and elevation
The ALT flap was raised with the patient in supine position as described by Cormack and Lamberty.31 A line is drawn between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superolateral border of the patella. This determines the axial line of the flap. The location of the main cutaneous perforators from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LFCA) was detected with a Doppler ultrasound probe using an 8-MHz transducer and marked on the skin. The majority of these vessels are located in the inferolateral quadrant of a circle, with a radius of 3 cm if drawn from the midpoint as center. The flap is designed over the location of these vessels with its long axis parallel to that of the thigh. The flap may be reliably designed with the perforating vessels at the superior end of the skin flap to maximize pedicle length if required. Nine flaps were raised by using a sterile Esmarch tourniquet secured to a Steinman pin in the anterior superior iliac spine in the manner previously described by Cormack in 1992.32,33
Flap elevation starts at the medial edge and the skin is incised including the deep fascia of the thigh. The tissues are elevated until the intramuscular septum between rectus femoris and vastus lateralis is visualized. The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh will be encountered in the subcutaneous fat in its distal course at the anterosuperior edge of the flap. If a sensate (neurosensory) flap is desired, it may be included in the elevation.34 Motor branches of the femoral nerve to the lowermost part of vastus lateralis may be encountered deeply in the septum and should be preserved as much as possible.
If the perforator is septum-cutaneous, the vessels to the skin can be seen at this level, the dissection is straightforward and uncomplicated until the main pedicle is reached. In the absence of a septum-cutaneous perforator, it is necessary to elevate the flap until the perforator is identified emerging from the muscle and then to trace it back through the anterior part of vastus lateralis to its origin from the descending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery.
The dissection of the pedicle usually terminates at the point where the arterial branch to rectus femoris arises and its venous drainage joins unless a longer pedicle is required. The donor site is usually closed directly. If it is not possible to close the defect directly because a large skin paddle has been harvested, then the skin edges can be advanced and sutured to the muscle to reduce the size of the defect and the remaining area can be closed with a skin graft taken from the medial aspect of the same thigh.
RESULTS
From October 1999 to December 2008, 55 free ALT flaps were transferred to reconstruct soft-tissue defects of the extremities, trunk or head and neck in 55 patients. There were 39 male and 16 female with a mean age of 52 years (range, 13-73). Twenty-one ALT flaps were used for upper and lower extremities, 13 for skull base, 15 for head and neck region, and 6 for the trunk (Table 1).
Table 1. Patients demographics (n = 55 patients) | ||
Number | Frequency | |
Male | 39 | 71% |
Female | 16 | 29% |
Age | 52 (range, 1373) | |
Flaps harvested | 55 | |
Following tumors excision | 34 | 62% |
Following trauma | 21 | 38% |
Defect site | ||
Upper limb | 9 | 16% |
Lower limb | 12 | 22% |
Skull base | 13 | 24% |
Trunk | 6 | 11% |
Head and neck | 15 | 27% |
In 21 patients, the ALT was performed following trauma and in 34 to repair defects resulting from excision of malignant tumors. Numerous recipient vessels were used. The flap size ranged from 12 to 35 cm in length and 3 to 11 cm in width. All flap perforator vessels were located preoperatively using a handheld Doppler ultrasound probe and their position confirmed at the time of flap harvest. In no cases were the detected perforator vessels either absent or arising from a vessel other than the lateral femoral circumflex artery (LCFA). The duration of surgery from induction of general anesthesia to leaving the operating room averaged 9.3 hours (range, 5.5-11.5). None of the patients had any intraoperative complications. The mean flap ischemia time was 86 minutes (range, 62-103) (Table 2).
Table 2. Overall operative findings in 55 ALT free flaps harvested in 55 patients | ||
Number/Average | Frequency | |
Flap anatomy and type | ||
Musculocutaneous | 32 | 59% |
True perforator flap | 14 | |
Thinned | 1 | |
With a cuff of muscle | 18 | |
Sensate | 2 | |
Septo/fasciocutaneous | 23 | 41% |
Thinned | 3 | |
Sensate | 1 | |
Flap size (average) | ||
Length, cm | 24 (range, 1235) | |
Width, cm | 9 (range, 411) | |
Operative time, h | 9 (range, 5 -11) | |
Ischemia time, min | 86 (range, 62103) | |
Length of pedicle, cm | 12 (range, 1016) | |
Donor site closure | ||
Direct closure | 42 | 79% |
Skin graft | 13 | 21% |
During flap elevation, a direct septum-cutaneous perforator was observed in 11 patients (22%); in all these cases, the ALT was transferred as a fasciocutaneous flap. In 38 patients (78%), a muscle-cutaneous perforator was found. Of the muscle-cutaneous perforators, intramuscular dissection of a true perforator flap was carried out in 14 cases (37%) and a cuff of vastus lateralis muscle was taken with the perforator in 24 patients (63%) either for safe elevation of the flap, to fill deep defect and/or to cover irregular exposed bone. In 3 patients, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was also included for a sensate flap respectively for a total tongue and 2 hand reconstructions. In 4 cases (3 hands and 1 forehead reconstruction), the ALT flap was thinned leaving a 5 to 6 mm layer of subcutaneous fat.
The donor site was closed directly in 42 patients (79%) and a meshed split skin graft was used in 13 (21%). Two flaps required reexploration of the microvascular anastomoses for venous congestion and both were successfully salvaged.
In 6 patients (12%), donor site problems were observed. These included 2 cases of partial skin graft taken, 3 persistent seromas that required few aspirations to resolve, and 1 hematoma evacuated in theater. The muscle power of the quadriceps of the donor thigh after harvesting ALT muscle-cutaneous flap did not obviously affect the strength or stability of the donor knee and therefore no donor site problems were noted in the long follow-up.
All flaps remained healthy during an average follow-up of 18 months (range, 5-38) (Table 3); all patients had good volume filling of their defects and were generally satisfied with the outcome.
Table 3. Outcomes in 55 reconstructions using the ALT free flaps | ||
Number | Frequency | |
Flap survival | 55 | 100% |
Total lost | 0 | |
Partial flap necroses | 0 | |
Flap complications | ||
Arterial | 0 | |
Venous congestion | 2 | 4% |
Reexploration | 2 | 4% |
Hematoma | 0 | |
Donor site complications | ||
Infection | 0 | |
Hematoma | 1 | 2% |
Seroma | 3 | 5% |
Skin graft lost | 0 | |
Partial skin graft lost | 2 | 4% |
Average follow-up, mo | 18 (range, 248) | |
DISCUSSION
The ALT flap is based on the septum-cutaneous and/or muscle-cutaneous perforators from the descending branch of the LCFA. This vessel sends perforators through the septum between the vastus lateralis and the rectus femoris muscles or through the substance of vastus lateralis, supplying a large skin paddle on the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. If a septum-cutaneous perforator is found, the flap can be harvested as a septum-cutaneous flap,34 which is the ideal for most indications having the lowest morbidity in terms of donor site. However, if septum-cutaneous perforators are absent, the flap can then be harvested as a muscle-cutaneous flap, with varying amount of vastus lateralis muscle for added bulk, or as a true perforator flap following intramuscular dissection of the perforators.35,36
Careful preoperative planning in flap design is essential. Although different techniques have been recommended for the preoperative assessment and localization of the cutaneous perforators,32,35,37 the Doppler audiometer was found to be perfectly adequate in all our cases, as confirmed during flap harvest. It is, however, necessary to be familiar with the anatomical variations during flap elevation32 because most uncommonly, 2 descending branches of the LCFA run in parallel in the septum,2,3,6,23; therefore, it is particularly important to identify the deeper of these before dissecting out the pedicle.
Compared with other free flaps, the ALT flap has numerous advantages (Table 4), including the following: (1) the skin paddle is pliable and can be easily trimmed for any area that has to be reconstructed8,9,11,13 (Fig 1); (2) a large skin area that can be harvested even when only a single major cutaneous perforator is available30,36,37; (3) the flap anatomy allows safe modifications of its volume as required: in our series, we thinned successfully 4 flaps (3 hands, 1 forehead) (Fig 2) down to a 5 to 6 mm uniform layer of fat under loupe magnification except within a 2 cm radius of the vascular pedicle, carefully preserving the small veins beneath the dermis, as previously described.11,15,22 We did not encounter any complications of thinning such as skin necrosis, inadvertent perforator, or pedicle division or bleeding from the under-surface of the flap; (4) a long vascular pedicle can be obtained, up to 16 cm.27,28,29,30,35 This allows a wider choice of recipient vessels as illustrated in our series; (5) it can be a sensate flap by including the anterolateral femoral cutaneous nervethis is mandatory in hand reconstruction and advantageous in tongue reconstruction, even though its dissection takes slightly longer 11,20,22,34; (6) there is minimal morbidity at the donor site, the functional deficit following flap elevation was minimal and temporary even when a portion of vastus lateralis muscle was included. The vastus lateralis muscle is a syn-agonist of the other 3 knee extensors and its removal does not affect leg function. Occasionally, when the motor nerve to the lower part of the vastus lateralis passes between 2 perforators that are going to the flap, it requires to be divided to free the flap, then the nerve is divided as far distally as possible and repaired with the usual microsurgical techniques.
Table 4. Advantages of the ALT free flap in soft tissue reconstruction |
Skin paddle (large, pliable, reliable even on single perforator) |
Long vascular pedicle |
Large vessels enabling easy microvascular anastomoses |
Favorable vascular anatomy allows thinning of the flap |
Distant from many operative sites |
Harvest in supine position |
Can be made sensate |
Inclusion of the fascia lata |
Variable bulk |
Low donor site morbidity |
Easy flap to learn |
We grafted the donor site in 27% of cases but the skin graft did not influence the sliding of the vastus lateralis muscle. There was no change in gait at postoperative follow-up23,37,38; (7) It is easily harvested in the supine position, which is the safer and more comfortable position for the patient.23,29,30 (8) The location is usually distant from most defects allowing comfortable 2-team operating. (9) Thanks to its vascular anatomy that can be anastomosed as a flow-through pedicle, a situation which is very helpful in reconstructions of extremities avoiding the use of vein grafts. (10) In addition, by incorporating part of the vastus lateralis muscle in the flap, the ALT combines the benefits of a skin flap superficially with the benefits of muscle deeply (Figs 3a-3b). The muscle component is particularly useful for covering exposed fractures (Fig 4), osteomyelitis or for filling irregular defects such as following lateral temporal bone resection9,10,12,13 (Figs 5a-5c), or chest wall resection when the sternum is removed25,26 (Figs 6a-6b).
Figure 3. A 65-year-old man affected by recurrence of invasive basal cell carcinoma of the left orbital rim and left zygoma, previously treated with surgery and radiotherapy (Fig 3a) underwent wider resection, partial maxillectomy and exenteration of the left ocular globe. The resultant defect was repaired using a muscle-cutaneous ALT free flap anastomosed to the facial artery and internal jugular vein. It allowed a reasonable functional and aesthetic outcome (Fig 3b) |
Figure 5. A 57-year-old lady undergoing wide resection of the left ear and of the temporal bone down to the dura mater (Fig 5a) for osteo-radio-necrosis following previous treatment for a squamous cell carcinoma of the external auditory meatus. The resulting defect was reconstructed using a fascia latae graft and a muscle-cutaneous ALT free flap with a small cuff of vastus lateralis anastomosed to the lingual artery and the internal jugular vein. The outcome was acceptable after 18 month follow-up. Please note the poor color match of the flap in relation to the recipient site (Fig 5b). |
Figure 6. A 64-year-old lady with a large mass over the sternum caused by recurrence of previous left breast cancer (Fig 6a), who required partial resection of the sternum and the adjacent 4 pairs of ribs. Skeletal stabilization was achieved using composite synthetic materials. A muscle-cutaneous ALT free flap with a small segment of the vastus lateralis muscle was anastomosed to the facial artery and internal jugular vein to repair the soft tissue defect (Fig 6b) allowing a good functional and aesthetic result confirmed at 14 months follow-up (Fig 6c). |
(11) No less important is that it is an easy flap to raise and anastomose (large caliber vessels), hence the operating time is not overly long; in our series, a lot of time was spent on tumor resection and for anesthetic preparation.33,35
There are some disadvantages to this flap. The donor site scarring associated with use of skin grafts in a large defect may not be acceptable, particularly in female patients. The high incidence of hairy skin in this area in men, especially in Caucasians may also not be desirable in particular for oral defect reconstruction (Fig 7). This is not a problem for the majority of head and neck cancer cases, as the majority subsequently have postoperative radiotherapy. We also believe that the ALT flap is not appropriate in obese patients, particularly women in which often a skin graft is required to repair the donor site (Table 5).
Table 5. Disadvantages of the ALT free flap in soft tissue reconstruction | |||
Variable vascular anatomy | |||
Poor color match in head and neck reconstruction | |||
Not suitable for obese population | |||
High incidence of hairy skin in Caucasian | |||
Variation in the origin and course of the supplying perforators are a theoretical problem largely described35-37; however, we did not find that this was a cause for abandoning flap elevation in any cases in our series.
Over the 16-year period, there has been a diversification in the indications for the ALT free flap in our department. Initially most of the ALT flaps were performed principally for extremity surgery reflecting the specialist interest of the existing consultant (G.C.C.) but with the enlargement of the plastic surgery service (2 new consultants C.M.M. and J.W.S.) and the increasing number of its publications in the literature, the use of the ALT free flap has been extended mainly outside the limbs, therefore routinely adopted for head and neck, intraoral, skull base, and chest wall reconstruction.
The donor site should be convenient for harvest, remain inconspicuous, and cause low morbidity. The ALT flap fulfils many of these requirements, and it is adaptable to a wide range of clinical situations.
CONCLUSION
In summary, in our experience, the anatomical and logistical features of the ALT free flap make it the flap of choice in a wide range of soft tissue reconstructive situations. It contains the right tissue components in the correct amounts to fulfill the functional and cosmetic requirements of the recipient defect; it is harvested from a convenient location, in a convenient position with minimal donor site morbidity. Flap design only requires a handheld Doppler and a measuring tape. The flap, thanks to its easy orientation, can be tailored to the individual's defect by positioning for pedicle length, incorporating skin/muscle/sensory nerve and thinning for a perfect contour.
For all these advantages, the number of ALT free flaps has increased in our Department in the last few years. In addition the learning curve for this flap is faster than other perforator flaps, allowing trainees to improve their confidence with the free tissue transfer. We feel that it can represent a valid substitute for most of the commonly used soft-tissue flaps.38
1. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:149-59. |
2. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. Fasciocutaneous vessels: their distribution on the trunk and limbs, and their clinical application in tissue transfer. Anat Clin. 1984;6:121-31. |
3. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. The blood supply of thigh skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75:342-54. |
4. Koshima I, Fukuda H, Soeda S. Free combined anterolateral thigh flap and vascularized iliac bone graft with double vascular pedicle. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1989;5:55-61. |
5. Zhou G, Qiao Q, Chen GY, Ling YC, Swift R. Clinical experience and surgical anatomy of 32 free anterolateral thigh flap transplantations. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44:91-6. |
6. Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP, Epstein MD, Sampson CE, Hergrueter CA. Anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:585-92. |
7. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Sekido M, et al. Anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1191-7. |
8. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, et al. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of head and neck defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:1325-31. |
9. Demirkan F, Chen HC, Wei FC, et al. The versatile anterolateral thigh flap: a musculocutaneous flap in disguise in head and neck Reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2000;53:30-6. |
10. Cipriani R, Contedini F, Caliceti U, Cavina C. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the oral cavity using the free anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:53-7. |
11. Javaid M, Cormack GC. Anterolateral thigh free flap for complex soft tissue hand Reconstructions. J Hand Surg [Br]. 2003;28:21-7. |
12. Mureau MA, Posch NA, Meeuwis CA, Hofer SO. Anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction of large external facial skin defects: a follow-up study on functional and aesthetic recipient and donor-site outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1077-86. |
13. Malata CM, Tehrani H, Kumiponjera D, Hardy DG, Moffat DA. Use of anterolateral thigh and lateral arm fasciocutaneous free flaps in lateral skull base reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57:169-75; discussion 176. |
14. Ross GL, Dunn R, Kirkpatrick J, et al. To thin or not to thin: the use of the anterolateral thigh flap in the reconstruction of intraoral defects. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:409-13. |
15. Wolff KD, Kesting M, Thurmuller P, Bockmann R, Holzle F. The anterolateral thigh as a universal donor site for soft tissue reconstruction in maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:323-31. |
16. Lin DT, Coppit GL, Burkey BB. Use of the anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;12:300-4. |
17. Yildirim S, Gideroglu K, Akoz T. Anterolateral thigh flap: ideal free flap choice for lower extremity soft-tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;19:225-33. |
18. Cavadas PC, Sanz-Jimenez-Rico JR. Use of the extended-pedicle vastus lateralis free flap for lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1070-6. |
19. Ozkan O, Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. The use of free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstructing soft tissue defects of the lower extremities. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:455-61. |
20. Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y. New anterolateral thigh perforator flap with a short pedicle for reconstruction of defects in the upper extremities. Ann Plast Surg. 200l;51(1):30-6. |
21. Wang HT, Fletcher JW, Erdmann D, Levin LS. Use of the anterolateral thigh free flap for upper-extremity reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30:859-64. |
22. Adani R, Tarallo L, Marcoccio I, Cipriani R, Gelati C, Innocenti M. Hand reconstruction sing the thin anterolateral thigh flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:467-73; discussion 474-7. |
23. Wei FC, Suominen S, Cheng MH, Celik N, Lai YL. Anterolateral thigh flap for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:82-8. |
24. Rosenberg JJ, Chandawarkar R, Ross MI, Chevray PM. Bilateral anterolateral thigh flaps for large-volume breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2004;24:281-4. |
25. Press BH, Colen SR, Boyd A, Golomb F. Reconstruction of a large chest wall defect with a musculocutaneous free flap using anterolateral thigh musculature. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;20:238-41. |
26. Di Candia M, Wells FC, Malata CM. Anterolateral thigh free flap for complex composite central chest wall defect reconstruction with extrathoracic microvascular anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1581-8. |
27. Kuo YR, Seng-Feng J, Kuo FM, Liu YT, Lai PW. Versatility of the free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects: review of 140 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48:161-6. |
28. Ozkan O, Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. An ideal and versatile material for soft-tissue coverage: experiences with most modifications of the anterolateral thigh flap. J. Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;20(5):377-83. |
29. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2219-26; discussion 2227-30. |
30. Celik N, Wei FC, Lin CH, et al. Technique and strategy in anterolateral thigh perforator flap surgery, based on an analysis of 15 complete and partial failures in 439 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2211-6; discussion 2217-8. |
31. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fasciocutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:80-7. |
32. Cormack G. Anterolateral thigh flap: technical tip to facilitate elevation. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:74. |
33. Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone: 1994;23643, 3667. |
34. Ribuffo D, Cigna E, Gargano F, Spalvieri C, Scuderi N. The innervated anterolateral thigh flap: anatomical study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:464-70. |
35. Koshima I, Fukuda H, Utunomiya R, Soeda S. The anterolateral thigh flap; variations in its vascular pedicle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:260-2. |
36. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, Nakatsuka T, Harii K. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1517-23. |
37. Luo S, Raffoul W, Luo J, et al. Anterolateral thigh flap: a review of 168 cases. Microsurgery. 1999;19:232-8. |
38. Di Candia M, Lie KH, Kumiponjera D, Malata CM. Versatility of the anterolateral thigh free flap for soft tissue reconstruction: the Cambridge experience. Br. J. Surg. 2008;95(S6):1-104 (abstract). |
JOURNAL INFORMATION | ARTICLE INFORMATION |
Journal ID: ePlasty | Volume: 12 |
ISSN: 1937-5719 | E-location ID: e21 |
Publisher: Open Science Company, LLC | Published: May 3, 2012 |