Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Editorial

Carotid Stenting: A Gordian Knot to be Unraveled (Part II of II)<br />

Gerald Dorros, MD, FACC, ScD (Yeshiva), ScD (Colby)
March 2003
Conclusions. As this nascent period of endovascular carotid procedures draws to an end, what is clear, crystal clear to me, is that a significant conundrum exists. The Gordian knot to be unraveled is not whether stent-supported carotid angioplasty is the standard of care, but rather how will physicians adequately develop the cognition and skill to safely perform these procedures. The tools will define themselves. However, the image of an inexperienced interventionist (cardiologist, radiologist, or surgeon), having limited or minimal diagnostic angiographic imaging and catheter skills, let-alone, the necessary interventional cognitive and technical skill, performing carotid angioplasty with inadequate imaging systems is disconcerting. Scalpel experience does not miraculously transfer and impart to the surgeon the average interventionist’s skills and ability without dedication, education, study and work. The unbridled and cavalier use of stents or any devices within the extracranial carotid bifurcation, as standard care by such unskilled physicians is inappropriate, and should not be condoned. Without a resolution of this quagmire, trained physicians, from whatever specialty, will be precluded from best caring for patients. Presently, some segments of the medical community are not sufficiently perplexed as to the equivalency of carotid endarterectomy and stent-supported carotid angioplasty. Spokes-persons for each contingent vigorously and passionately detail their perspectives, often referencing their observational experiences as evidence of their unbiased, and logical conclusions. However, clinical equipoise, a genuine state of doubt regarding the equivalence of each procedure or the superiority of one procedure over another, does not exist. The point of perplexity has passed. While some members of the medical community may not share this view, their opposition and disagreement appears more likely to be lack of familiarity with the extant data, obstinacy, self-interest, and/or an inflexible need for a randomized trial to demonstrate the statistical merit of the therapy, rather than an assessment of the data. Disabling, debilitating, devastating and deadly complications can result from both surgery and angioplasty; testimonials and limited observational experiences or waiting 7 years for the results of an antiquated study with FDA imprimatur should not impede progress. Carotid angioplasty, subjects the patient to an immediate lower complication rate than carotid endarterectomy, with fewer traumas, and precludes subsequent ipsilateral neurologic deficit. While neurologic deficit can and will occur with both procedures, the incidence of such deficits appears significantly less likely to occur with carotid angioplasty, as such, all physicians should remember this when they make their therapeutic recommendations.
1. Theron J, Cosgrove R, Melanson D, Ethier R. Embolization with temporary balloon occlusion of the internal carotid or vertebral arteries. Neuroradiology 1986;28:246–253. 2. Theron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, Courtheoux F. Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and postsurgical stenosis of carotid arteries. Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:495–500. 3. Theron J, Raymond J, Casasco A, Courtheoux F. Percutaneous angioplasty of atherosclerotic and post surgical stenosis of carotid arteries. Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:495–500. 4. Maiza D, Theron J, Pelouze GA, et al. Local fibrinolytic therapy in ischemic carotid pathology. Ann Vasc Surg 1988;2:205–214. 5. Theron J. Carotid angioplasty techniques. J Neurosurg 1989;71:301. 6. Theron J, Courtheroux P, Alachkar, et al. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. Am J Neuroradiol 1990;11:869–874. 7. Theron J, Payelle G, Coskun O, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: Treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement. Radiology 1996;201:627–636. 8. Dorros G. Carotid arterial obliterative disease: Should endovascular revascularization (stent supported angioplasty) today supplant carotid endarterectomy. J Intervent Cardiol 1996;9:193–196. 9. Ferguson GG. Angioplasty for carotid disease. Arch Neurol 1996;53:698–700. 10. Hobson RW II, Brott T, Ferguson R, et al. Regarding “Statement regarding carotid angioplasty and stenting”. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:1117. 11. Hobson RW II. Status of carotid angioplasty and stenting trials. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:791. 12. Beebe HG. Scientific evidence demonstrating the safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting: do we have enough to draw conclusions yet? J Vasc Surg 1998;27:788–790. 13. Dorros G. Stent-supported carotid angioplasty: Should it be done, and, if so, by whom? A 1998 perspective. Circulation 1998;98:927–930. 14. Bettmann MA, Katzen BT, Whisnant J, et al. Carotid stenting and angioplasty: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Stroke 1998; 29:336–338. 15. Roubin GS. The status of carotid stenting. Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1378–1381. 16. Roubin GS. Carotid stenting: Rethinking the investigational-regulatory strategy. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000;50:9. 17. Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T, et al. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg 2001;33(Suppl 2):S111–116. 18. Yadav JS, Roubin GS, King P, et al. Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Initial experience. Stroke 1996;27:2075–2079. 19. Yadav JS, Roubin GS, Iyer SS, et al. Elective stenting of extracranial carotid arteries. Circulation 1997;95:376–381. 20. Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ. Systematic comparison of the early outcome of angioplasty and endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery disease. Stroke 2000;31:3079–3083. 21. New G, Roubin GS, Iyer SS, et al. Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: A multicenter study. J Endovasc Ther 2000;7:345–352. 22. Wholey MH, Wholey M, Mathias K, et al. Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000;50:160–167. 23. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS, et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: A 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 2001;103:532–537. 24. Paniagua D, Howell M, Strickman N, et al. Outcomes following extracranial carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Invas Cardiol 2001;13:375–381. 25. Dorros G, Jaff MR, Murphy KJ, Mathiak L. The acute outcome of tibioperoneal vessel angioplasty in 417 cases with claudication and critical limb ischemia. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;45:251–256. 26. Dorros G, Jaff M, Mathiak L, et al. Four-year follow-up of Palmaz-Schatz stent revascularization as treatment for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Circulation 1998;98:642–647. 27. White CJ, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, Jenkins JS. Renal artery stent placement. J Endovasc Surg 1998;5:71–77. 28. Khosla S, White CJ, Collins TJ, et al. Effects of renal artery stent implantation in patients with renovascular hypertension presenting with unstable angina or congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:363–366. 29. Kumar K, Dorros G, Bates MC, et al. Primary stent deployment in occlusive subclavian artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;34:281–285. 30. Chastain HD II, Gomez CR, Iyer S, et al. Influence of age upon complications of carotid artery stenting. UAB Neurovascular Angioplasty Team. J Endovasc Surg 1999;6:217–222. 31. Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Gomez CR, et al. Carotid artery stenting in patients with high neurologic risks. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1411–1413, A8–A9. 32. Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Liu MW, et al. Early results of percutaneous intervention for severe coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:600–602, A9. 33. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy inn symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453. 34. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: Surgical results in 1,415 patients. Stroke 1999:1751–1758. 35. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1415–1425. 36. Morgenstern LB, Fox AJ, Sharpe BL, et al. The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Neurology 1997;48:911–915. 37. Gasecki AP, Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, et al. Early endarterectomy for severe carotid artery stenosis after a non-disabling stroke: Results from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:288–295. 38. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;237:1421–1428. 39. Baker WH, Howard VJ, Howard G, Toole JF. Effect of contralateral occlusion on long-term efficacy of endarterectomy in the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study (ACAS). ACAS Investigators. Stroke 2000;31:2330–2334. 40. Hartmann A, Hupp T, Koch HC, et al. Prospective study on the complication rate of carotid surgery. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999;9:152–156. 41. Mayo SW, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Lucas FL, et al. Carotid endarterectomy after NASCET and ACAS: A statewide study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Study. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:1017–1022; discussion 1022–1023. 42. Darling RC III, Kreienberg PB, Roddy SP, et al. Analysis of the effect of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study on the outcome and volume of carotid endarterectomy. Cardiovasc Surg 2000;8:436–440. 43. Riles TS, Fisher FS, Lamparello PJ, et al. Immediate and long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic high-grade stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 1994;8:144–149. 44. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, et al. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population. JAMA 1998;279:1278–1281. 45. Goldstein LB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB, Oddone EZ. Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1998;29:750–753. 46. Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty study (CAVATAS): A randomized trial. Lancet 2001;357:1729–1737. 47. Vanninen R, Aikia M, Kononen M, et al. Sub-clinical cerebral complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: Prospective analysis with magnetic resonance imaging, quantitative electroencephalography, and neuropsychological assessment. Arch Neurol 1998;55:618–627. 48. Selnes OA, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM Jr., et al. Determinants of cognitive change after coronary artery bypass surgery: A multifactorial problem. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1669–1676. 49. Selnes OA, Royall RM, Grega MA, et al. Cognitive changes 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting: Is there evidence of late decline? Arch Neurol 2001;58:598–604. 50. Selnes OA, McKhann GM. Coronary-artery-bypass surgery and the brain. N Engl J Med 2001;344:451–452. 51. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2001;344:395–402. 52. McKhann GM, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM Jr., et al. Cognitive outcome after coronary artery bypass: A one-year prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:510–515. 53. Rothwell P, Slattery J, Warlow CP. A systematic review of the risks of stroke and death dues to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 1996;27:260–265. 54. Rothwell P. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of stroke in the very elderly. Lancet 2001;357:1142–1143. 55. Rothwell PM. Carotid artery disease and the risk of ischemic stroke and coronary vascular events. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10(Suppl 5):21–33. 56. Rothwell PM. Who should have carotid surgery or angioplasty? Br Med Bull 2000;56:526–538. 57. Rothwell PM. Carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Consistent results from two large randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 1999;20:1055–1057. 58. Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. Carotid endarterectomy in patients with recently symptomatic moderate (30–69%) carotid stenosis: No overall benefit. Eur Heart J 1997;18:355–356. 59. Jeret JS, Barnett HJM, Broderick JP. Carotid endarterectomy: Another wake-up call. Neurology 2001;56:1118. 60. Bernardini GL, Darling RC III, Shah DM, et al. Results of carotid endarterectomy with prospective neurologist follow-up. Neurology 2001;56:1119–1121. 61. Moore WS, Barnett HJM, Beebe HG, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee, American Heart Association. Stroke 1995;26:188–200. 62. Kachel R, Basche S, Heerklotz I, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of supra-aortic arteries, especially the internal carotid artery. Neuroradiology 1991;33:191–194. 63. Kachel R. Results of balloon angioplasty in the carotid arteries. J Endovasc Surg 1996;3:22–30. 64. Mathias K. Ein neuartiges Katheter-System zur Perkutanen Transluminalen Angioplastie von Karotisstenosen. Fortschr Med 1977;95:1007–1011. 65. Mathias K, Mittermayer CH, Ensinger H, Neff W. Perkutane Katheterdilatation von Karotisstenosen. Röfo 1980;133:258–261. 66. Diethrich EB, Rodriguez-Lopez J, Ramiah V, et al. Comparison of carotid stenting with and without cerebral protection versus carotid endarterectomy in a single center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;(Suppl A):38A. 67. Shawl F, Hakim J, Mahmood S, et al. Outcome of carotid stenting in octogenarians compared to non-octogenarians: Acute and long-term outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;(Suppl A):51A. 68. Henry M, Klonaris C, Amor M, et al. Stent supported carotid angioplasty. The beneficial effect of cerebral protection. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;(Suppl A): 39A. 69. Al-Mubarak N, Vitek J, Iyer SS, et al. Immediate neurovascular rescue for stroke complicating invasive coronary procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;(Suppl A):39A. 70. Hobson RW II, Brott T, Ferguson R, et al. CREST: Carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:457–458. 71. Roubin GS, Hobson RW II, White R, et al. CREST and CARESS to evaluate carotid stenting: Time to get to work! Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST). CArotid Revascularization with Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CARESS). J Endovasc Ther 2001;8:107–110. 72. Baker W. CREST: A moral and ethical conundrum. Cardiovasc Surg 1997;5:461–462.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement