ADVERTISEMENT
Cedars-Sinai: Small, Preliminary Study Shows Treatment With ACE Inhibitors Might Impair the Immune System's Ability to Battle Dangerous Bacteria
ACE inhibitors, a type of medication taken daily by millions of Americans to treat hypertension, diabetic kidney disease and heart failure, could increase patents' risk of infection under certain conditions, preliminary research from Cedars-Sinai suggests.
Although further study is needed, the finding eventually could lead healthcare providers to prescribe alternatives for some patients. The study was published July 29 in Science Translational Medicine.
"While these drugs have been largely thought to be safe, published studies have noted an association between the use of ACE inhibitors and some forms of infection," said Zakir Khan, PhD, assistant professor of Research in the departments of Biomedical Sciences and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Cedars-Sinai and senior author of the study. "ACE inhibitors are good medicines, but we wanted to further explore this association because alternative drugs are now available."
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) increases blood pressure by producing the hormone angiotensin II, which constricts blood vessels. ACE inhibitors block production of the hormone and lower blood pressure by allowing veins and arteries to relax.
To gauge whether heart patients treated with ACE inhibitors might face increased risk of infection during heart valve replacement or repair, Khan and colleagues tested laboratory mice under conditions that mimic heart surgery, exposing them to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a drug-resistant type of bacteria.
Laboratory mice that had been treated with ACE inhibitors had significantly higher incidence of bacterial heart tissue infection than those not treated with ACE inhibitors. Mice treated with drugs called angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), alternatives to ACE inhibitors that block the action of angiotensin II on blood vessels but do not stop the body from producing it, did not have increased infection rates.
Researchers also tested the blood of seven human volunteers who received a week of daily treatment with the ACE inhibitor ramipril. The blood samples showed decreased immune response to MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria, all of which can cause blood, lung and surgical-site infections.
"Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity is important for the immune response of white blood cells called neutrophils," said Khan. "Neutrophils are among the first line of defense against invading organisms that cause disease, and are an essential part of the immune system. ACE inhibitors hamper neutrophil immunity by inhibiting activity of this important enzyme in these cells."
That this happened in human patients as well as in mice surprised the research team.
"Millions of people take ACE inhibitors for controlling blood pressure, and so far, there have been no reports of serious problems with infection rates," said Khan. "We thought the drugs might not have this effect on human neutrophils because they are different from mouse neutrophils in many ways."
For instance, human neutrophils produce proteins called defensins, which recognize and kill infectious microorganisms, while mouse neutrophils do not. And the percentage of neutrophils in human blood is roughly twice as high as that in mouse blood.
"But our results were exactly the same in humans as in mice," Khan said. "In human participants receiving the ACE inhibitor ramipril for one week, the medication reduced the bacteria-killing activity of neutrophils in blood samples."
Because the group of human participants was so small, and because they were tested after just one week of ramipril treatment rather than the extended period usually associated with ACE inhibitors, further research is needed to confirm these initial results and to understand the drugs' effects on immunity over time. A study of human patients treated with ARBs is also needed to determine whether ARBs reduce neutrophil function.
Funding: The study was supported by American Heart Association grant 19CDA34760010 and National Institutes of Health grants P01HL129941, R01AI134714 and R01HL142672.