Skip to main content

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Peer Review

Peer Reviewed

Case Series

Retrospective Review of Complications and Outcomes in COVID-19–Positive Patients With Comorbidities Undergoing Limb Salvage Procedures in a Tertiary Care Wound Center

June 2023
1044-7946
Wounds. 2023;35(6):109-116. doi:10.25270/wnds/22100

Abstract

Introduction. COVID-19 illness is associated with increased operative risks, ranging from delayed wound healing and coagulopathy to increased risk of mortality. Objective. This article describes the authors’ recent experience of the implications of COVID-19 on limb salvage procedures. Materials and Methods. Patients who underwent LE limb salvage procedures within 30 days of a positive COVID-19 diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical factors, postoperative complications, and management were collected. Results. Of 597 patients screened from February 2020 to March 2022, a total of 67 (11.2%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, of which 17 received the diagnosis within 30 days of surgery and were thus included. Average follow-up was 43 ± 3.2 months, at which point 6 (35.3%) were fully healed. The mortality rate at the most recent follow-up visit was 29.4% of patients (n = 5). Two patients required admission to the SICU following index procedure, and 1 necessitated a return to the operating room. Conclusion. COVID-19 may negatively affect the wound healing process while increasing the mortality rate amongst patients with multiple or severe comorbidities undergoing limb salvage procedures. Medical providers need to be aware of the complexity of these patients and apply a multi-disciplinary protocol to obtain successful outcomes.

Abbreviations

AKA, above knee amputation; ALT, anterolateral thigh; BKA, below knee amputation; BMI, body mass index; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; FTT, free tissue transfer; LE, lower extremity; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; PE, pulmonary embolism; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; SICU, surgical intensive care unit.

Introduction

As of February 2022, more than 78 million cases of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, have been documented in the United States alone.1 As the virus has spread globally, considerable evidence has emerged linking COVID-19 with a hypercoagulable, hyperinflammatory state that leads to venous and arterial thromboembolism and dysregulation of wound healing pathways.2-4 Upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines and subsequent dysregulation of coagulation in COVID-19 infection can lead to PE and deep vein thrombosis,2,5-7 as well as extrapulmonary thromboses such as acute limb ischemia, large vessel arteriosclerosis obliterans, myocardial infarction, and stroke.8-12 This same hyperinflammatory state has been associated with poor wound healing and locally elevated proinflammatory cytokines.13 While COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for surgical mortality, the attributable risk of perioperative death due to infection remains difficult to isolate.14

At the authors’ limb salvage center, patients with complex LE wounds often require microsurgical reconstruction. Patients typically undergo extensive surgical debridement before, during, and after LE reconstruction and amputation procedures. When patients continue progressing with standard treatment but are not candidates for FTT, the need for eventual amputation is discussed. Patients with chronic LE wounds typically have multiple coexisting medical comorbidities—such as diabetes, hypertension, and PVD—that negatively affect their microvasculature and wound healing. Superimposing the robust inflammation of COVID-19 infection in those with baseline vascular dysfunction poses theoretical additional perioperative risks and alterations in wound healing amongst patients undergoing LE reconstruction surgery. Although surgical guidelines have been proposed for managing patients during the pandemic,15-18 there is currently a paucity of literature specifically focused on LE reconstructive procedures to guide surgeons in making evidence-based operative decisions. The authors describe their recent experiences with 17 patients who underwent LE limb salvage procedures—including FTT, amputation, and debridement—within 30 days of their COVID-19 positive diagnosis.

Materials and Methods

All operative procedures for chronic LE wounds performed by the senior authors (K.K.E. and C.E.A.) at a tertiary wound care center from February 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 1462 procedures performed during this period, 597 patients were screened for a COVID-19 diagnosis, and of those, 67 (11.2%) patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 were identified. The surgical procedure that fell within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis was considered the “index” procedure. All patients who were COVID-negative or were diagnosed more than 30 days before or after their date of surgery were excluded. Ultimately, 17 patients were identified who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 within 30 days before or after their index procedure and were included in the study. Patient data on demographics, comorbidities, wound and operative details, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes were collected from patient charts. Primary outcomes included rates of 1) perioperative mortality, 2) SICU admission, and 3) thrombosis. Secondary outcomes collected included the development of or treatment for COVID-related symptoms and ambulation status. COVID-related symptoms were defined as the onset of fever, chills, cough, shortness of breath, dyspnea, fatigue, myalgias, headache, sore throat, nausea, or diarrhea in the setting of a positive nasopharyngeal reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction SARS-CoV-2 test. Decision to administer antiviral treatment with remdesivir was made on a case-by-case basis based on severity of clinical presentation.

Results

Patient characteristics

Seventeen patients received a diagnosis of COVID-19 within 30 days before or following LE reconstructive surgery. The patients were predominantly male (n = 12, 70.5%), had an average age of 56 ± 17.3 years, and a mean BMI of 28.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2. The median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5 (IQR: 2, 8.5). Most patients were Black (n = 10, 58.8%), 4 were former smokers (23.5%), and 2 were active smokers (11.8%). Table 1 summarizes patient demographics.

Table 1

While all 17 included patients tested positive for COVID-19 within 30 days either before or after their LE reconstructive procedure, 10 (58.8%) patients were diagnosed preoperatively and 7 (41.2%) postoperatively relative to the index procedure. The mean time between COVID-19 diagnosis and index procedure was 8.5 ± 15.2 days. Of the 5 patients (29.4%) who had been vaccinated before COVID-19 infection, 2 had completed the 3-dose series, with the remaining 3 patients only having received an initial dose. Infections varied in clinical presentation. COVID-19 infections were asymptomatic in 10 cases (58.8%) and symptomatic in 7 (41.2%), with 1 patient requiring treatment with remdesivir. Additional COVID-19 characteristics are detailed in Table 2.

Table 2

 

Operative details and postoperative outcomes

Across the 17 included patients, index procedures performed included: incision and drainage or debridement (n = 10, 58.8%), amputation (n = 6, 35.3%), and FTT to the LE (n = 3, 17.6%). Two patients underwent LE amputation followed by FTT. Amputation levels consisted of AKA (n = 2, 11.8%), BKA (n = 3, 17.6%), and metatarsophalangeal joint (n = 1, 5.9%). The 3 FTT procedures utilized 2 ALT flaps and 1 latissimus dorsi flap. Osteomyelitis was the most common indication for operation, occurring in 13.3% (n = 6) of procedures.

Postoperatively, all 17 patients received anticoagulation therapy, including subcutaneous heparin (n = 8, 47.1%), enoxaparin sodium injection (n = 7, 41.2%), clopidogrel bisulfate (n = 1, 5.9%,), and continuous heparin drip (n = 1, 5.9%). At least 1 postoperative complication occurred in 29.4% (n = 5) of patients, including necrosis/gangrene (n = 2, 11.8%), partial flap necrosis (n = 1, 5.9%), hypotension with delirium (n = 1, 5.9%), and a nonhealing wound (n = 1, 5.9%).

Two patients were admitted to the SICU following index procedure, 1 for hypotension necessitating pressor treatment and 1 after the patient developed a PE intraoperatively. One patient was taken back to the operating room on postoperative day 1 following an ALT flap to the lateral foot for concern of poor flap perfusion. On reoperation, venous congestion and intraluminal thrombi were noted. The patient was subsequently switched from subcutaneous heparin to heparin infusion following the procedure and was eventually discharged on postoperative day 11 with adequate flap healing. Table 3 details operative and postoperative outcomes.

Table 3

Table 3

 

Long-term outcomes

The average follow-up duration was 4.3 ± 3.2 months, at which point, 6 (35.3%) of the 17 patients were fully healed. Less than half of the patients (n = 6, 35.3%) were ambulatory at the most recent follow-up visit, though 5 generally (29.4%) required ambulatory assistance, with only 1 patient being independently ambulatory. The mortality rate at the most recent follow-up visit was 29.4% of patients (n = 5) (Table 4). Of the 5 patients that died, the mean duration between index procedure and date deceased was 61 ± 37.7 days. The most common causes of death were PE (n = 2, 40.0%) and pneumonia (n = 2, 40.0%), of which 1 was suspected to be aspiration pneumonia and the other a sequela of COVID-19 infection. The patients who developed PEs died 40 and 86 days postoperatively, and those with pneumonia died 26 and 39 days postoperatively. The patient who developed aspiration pneumonia originally underwent AKA as revision of a prior total knee arthroplasty secondary to infection, which likely contributed to their death. The fifth patient died 115 days postoperatively following an acute gastrointestinal bleed in the setting of suspected chronic alcohol misuse.

Table 4

Discussion

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic affected almost every realm of medical care, with surgical procedures being no exception. In March 2020, several surgical specialty societies, including the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, strongly recommended minimizing, postponing, or canceling elective procedures. Consequently, there was a 48% decrease in total surgical volume compared with 2019.19 Patients with chronic LE wounds were therefore advised to delay surgical intervention for as long as possible. Patients who underwent LE reconstruction during this time were consequently some of the sickest patients at the authors’ institutions, whose cases could not afford to be postponed. Consequently, to the authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first review assessing the effects of COVID-19 infection, specifically, on limb salvage operative outcomes in a highly comorbid patient population. Although this is a heterogenous group of patients in a single institution, the study highlights an increased perioperative mortality and morbidity in the study population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

While the pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused delayed patient presentations and worsened outcomes in highly comorbid patients undergoing limb salvage procedures, such as those with poorly controlled diabetes.20 One presumed theory documented across multiple specialties is that the induced hypercoagulable and hyperinflammatory state may pathologically affect wound healing and operative outcomes.21–26

The exact duration of COVID-associated coagulopathy or hyperinflammatory state has yet to be established. An analysis of 531 patients found that thrombotic events in the setting of COVID-19 infection occurred at a median of 11 days (range, 5–20 days) after the first symptoms of infection.21 However, thrombosis can also occur in cases of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections.22 In free flap surgery, most vascular complications manifest within the first 12 to 24 hours,27,28 yet multiple cases of delayed flap thrombosis in COVID-19–positive patients have been reported.23,24,29,30 Only 1 of the 3 patients in the current study who received a free flap within 30 days of a COVID-19 diagnosis developed postoperative flap thrombosis, occurring on postoperative day 1. Comparatively, 2 patients (11.8%) died from PE following BKA procedures. A previous study investigating venous thromboembolism rates following LE amputation in 49 patients without COVID-19 reported an overall PE rate of 12.2%, of which 4% were fatal.31 The differences in fatality rate secondary to PE between the 2 studies can likely be explained by the presence of COVID-19 infection, which was associated with a thromboembolic risk ratio of 33.05 during days 1 through 30 following infection.32 However, the presence of multiple underlying comorbidities such as diabetes and PVD make it difficult to attribute the increase in PE fatality rate strictly to COVID-19 infection. Future studies are therefore warranted to quantify the duration of coagulopathy and inflammatory states in patients who test positive for COVID-19 to better understand the pathology underlying increased mortality risk.

Ultimately, it remains difficult to determine whether COVID-19 infection is the sole cause of death in postoperative patients due to the multitude of confounding comorbidities of the study population. However, COVID-19 was identified as an independent risk factor for surgical mortality..14 The current study corroborates these findings by reporting a 29.4% mortality rate in patients undergoing limb salvage with COVID-19 positivity, a drastically higher rate in comparison to previous studies from the authors’ institution.33–35 Although additional larger, multi-institutional studies are needed, COVID-19 infections are beginning to show dangerous implications on a patient’s perioperative course. It is critical for both surgeons and patients to have an understanding of the increased risk of mortality and consider the necessary steps to delay surgery until outside this window of associated risk.

COVID-19 infection is also associated with perioperative delayed wound healing.24 Inouye highlighted near-total skin graft loss in the donor sites of COVID-19–positive patients who underwent mandibular reconstructions.24 Da Silveira et al described sternal dehiscence following a coronary artery bypass graft.36 In this study, 4 out of the 5 patients developed postoperative complications that were wound-related—including necrosis/gangrene (n = 2, 11.8%), partial flap necrosis (n = 1, 5.9%), and a nonhealing wound (n = 1, 5.9%)—which prolonged their hospital stay. These findings may be related to the unbalanced proinflammatory cytokine response that occurs during COVID-19 infection. This proinflammatory imbalance has the potential to impact wound healing and the patient’s overall hospital course.37,38 Previous studies assessing cytokine levels of chronic healing and nonhealing leg ulcers have identified persistently elevated levels of pro-inflammatory markers such as interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α.13,39 Inflammatory stimuli trigger enzymatic and reactive oxygen species-mediated endothelial glycocalyx degradation, expose cell adhesion molecules that promote leukocyte and platelet adhesion, and ultimately induce a pro-thrombotic state.40–42 Mitigating cytokine storms with low molecular weight heparin, particularly in patients with severe disease, may underlie the mortality benefit.43,44 Furthermore, these biomarkers have been found in higher concentrations from fluid drainage of chronic nonhealing wounds compared to healing wounds, suggesting their nocuous impact on the healing process.13 Additional studies are warranted to assess the local changes in the inflammatory response in COVID-19–positive patients with chronic wounds and guide the medical management of these high-risk patients.

Limitations

This study has several limitations, including its small sample size and retrospective nature, which relies on the quality of electronic medical records. Furthermore, COVID-19 documentation may be underreported, as the identification of patients is limited to those who underwent testing within the authors’ hospital system medical records. It is not possible to determine the degree of impact SARS-CoV-2 had on wound healing, as most of the included patients had multiple medical comorbidities that may have also played a role in delayed wound healing or hypercoagulability. The shift in the health care landscape, knowledge of disease, and hospital management during the 2-year study period may also influence perioperative outcomes and decisions to operate. Nonetheless, these results highlight the multitude of risks present when performing surgical procedures in COVID-19–positive patients with multiple comorbidities.

Conclusion

This study highlights the possible implications a COVID-19 infection may have on the postoperative course among patients with multiple or severe comorbidities undergoing limb salvage procedures. Such patients likely require additional perioperative risk stratification or close follow-up to optimize outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Authors: John D. Bovill, BS1; Lauren E. Berger, BA2,3; Samuel S. Huffman, BS1,2; Daisy Spoer, MS1,2; Romina Deldar, MD2; JiMin Ko, BA1; Aleek L. Aintablian, MS1; Cameron Akbari, MD4; Christopher E. Attinger, MD2; and Karen K. Evans, MD2

Affiliations: 1Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC; 2Department of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC; 3Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ; 4Department of Vascular Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC

ORCID: Berger, 0000-0002-5747-0009; Bovill, 0000-0002-0954-7964; Deldar, 0000-0003-4551-7436; Ko, 0000-0002-3104-7982

Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement: The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Correspondence: Karen Kim Evans, MD; MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Road, NW, Washington, DC 20007; prsgeorgetownresearch@gmail.com

How Do I Cite This?

Bovill JD, Berger LE, Huffman SS, et al. Retrospective review of complications and outcomes in COVID-19–positive patients with comorbidities undergoing limb salvage procedures in a tertiary care wound center. Wounds. 2023;35(6):109-115. doi:10.25270/wnds/22100

References

1. CDC COVID Data Tracker: Home. Accessed August 1, 2022. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home

2. Hanff TC, Mohareb AM, Giri J, Cohen JB, Chirinos JA. Thrombosis in COVID-19. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(12):1578-1589. doi:10.1002/AJH.25982

3. Abou-Ismail MY, Diamond A, Kapoor S, Arafah Y, Nayak L. The hypercoagulable state in COVID-19: Incidence, pathophysiology, and management. Thromb Res. 2020;194:101-115. doi:10.1016/J.THROMRES.2020.06.029

4. Gál P, Brábek J, Holub M, et al. Autoimmunity, cancer and COVID-19 abnormally activate wound healing pathways: critical role of inflammation. Histochem Cell Biol. 2022;158(5):415-434. doi:10.1007/S00418-022-02140-X

5. Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, et al. Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: An updated analysis. Thromb Res. 2020;191:148-150. doi:10.1016/J.THROMRES.2020.04.041

6. Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, et al. Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(4):268-277. doi:10.7326/M20-2003

7. Vulliamy P, Jacob S, Davenport RA. Acute aorto-iliac and mesenteric arterial thromboses as presenting features of COVID-19. Br J Haematol. 2020;189(6):1053-1054. doi:10.1111/BJH.16760

8. Griffin DO, Jensen A, Khan M, et al. Arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 in low-risk patients despite prophylaxis. Br J Haematol. 2020;190(1):e11-e13. doi:10.1111/BJH.16792

9. Zhou B, She J, Wang Y, Ma X. Venous thrombosis and arteriosclerosis obliterans of lower extremities in a very severe patient with 2019 novel coronavirus disease: a case report. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(1):229-232. doi:10.1007/S11239-020-02084-W

10. Galyfos G, Sianou A, Frountzas M, et al. Acute limb ischemia among patients with COVID-19 infection. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(1):326-342. doi:10.1016/J.JVS.2021.07.222

11. Castro RA, Frishman WH. Thrombotic complications of COVID-19 infection: a review. Cardiol Rev. 2021;29(1):43-47. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000347

12. Chan NC, Weitz JI. COVID-19 coagulopathy, thrombosis, and bleeding. Blood. 2020;136(4):381-383. doi:10.1182/BLOOD.2020007335

13. Trengove NJ, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Stacey MC. Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2000;8(1):13-25. doi:10.1046/J.1524-475X.2000.00013.X

14. Haffner MR, Le H v., Saiz AM, et al. Postoperative in-hospital morbidity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 infection compared with patients without COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e215697. doi:10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2021.5697

15. Coccolini F, Perrone G, Chiarugi M, et al. Surgery in COVID-19 patients: operational directives. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):25. doi:10.1186/S13017-020-00307-2

16. Bhangu A, Lawani I, Ng-Kamstra JS, et al; COVIDSurg Collaborative. Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020;107(9):1097-1103. doi:10.1002/BJS.11646

17. Tao KX, Zhang BX, Zhang P, Zhu P, Wang GB, Chen XP. Recommendations for general surgery clinical practice in novel coronavirus pneumonia situation. Article in Chinese. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;58(0):E001. doi:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0529-5815.2020.0001

18. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-1062. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

19. Mattingly AS, Rose L, Eddington HS, et al. Trends in US surgical procedures and health care system response to policies curtailing elective surgical operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2138038-e2138038. doi:10.1001/JAMANETWORKOPEN.2021.38038

20. Zayed H, Musajee M, Thulasidasan N, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes in patients with critical limb threatening ischaemia and diabetic foot infection. Ann Surg. 2022;275(6):1037. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000004677

21. Fournier M, Faille D, Dossier A, et al. Arterial thrombotic events in adult inpatients with COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(2):295-303. doi:10.1016/J.MAYOCP.2020.11.018

22. Etkin Y, Conway AM, Silpe J, et al. Acute arterial thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 in the New York City area. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;70:290-294. doi:10.1016/J.AVSG.2020.08.085

23. Nassar AH, Maselli AM, Dowlatshahi AS. Microvascular free tissue transfer in the setting of COVID-19 associated coagulopathy: a case report. Orthoplast Surg. 2021;4:20. doi:10.1016/J.ORTHOP.2021.02.002

24. Inouye D, Zhou S, Clark B, Swanson M, Chambers T. Two cases of impaired wound healing among patients with major head and neck free-flap reconstruction in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20088. doi:10.7759/CUREUS.20088

25. Talmor G, Grube JG, Eloy JA, Liu JK, Hsueh WD. Nasoseptal flap necrosis after endoscopic skull base surgery in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:374-377. doi:10.1016/J.WNEU.2020.05.237

26. Wollina U, Karadağ AS, Rowland-Payne C, Chiriac A, Lotti T. Cutaneous signs in COVID-19 patients: a review. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(5):e13549. doi:10.1111/DTH.13549

27. C Hosein R, Cornejo A, T Wang H. Postoperative monitoring of free flap reconstruction: A comparison of external Doppler ultrasonography and the implantable Doppler probe. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016;24(1):11-19. doi:10.4172/PLASTIC-SURGERY.1000953

28. Salgado CJ, Moran SL, Mardini S. Flap monitoring and patient management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6 Suppl):e295-e302. doi:10.1097/PRS.0B013E3181BCF07B

29. Benmoussa N, de Kerangal Q, Leymarie N, et al. Failure of free flaps in head and neck oncology surgery in COVID-19 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(2):251e-252e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007120

30. Lhuaire M, Garrido I, Cladière-Nassif V, Dumaine V, Lantieri L. Reconstructive microsurgery emergency in a patient with COVID-19. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(4):523E-525E. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007266

31. Struijk-Mulder MC, van Wijhe W, Sze YK, et al. Death and venous thromboembolism after lower extremity amputation. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(12):2680-2684. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04067.x

32. Katsoularis I, Fonseca-Rodríguez O, Farrington P, et al. Risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding after covid-19: nationwide self-controlled cases series and matched cohort study. BMJ. 2022;377:e069590. doi:10.1136/BMJ-2021-069590

33. Attinger CE, Ducic I, Cooper P, Zelen CM. The role of intrinsic muscle flaps of the foot for bone coverage in foot and ankle defects in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(4):1047-1054. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000021448.57210.52

34. Wukich DK, Raspovic KM, Suder NC. Patients with diabetic foot disease fear major lower-extremity amputation more than death. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018;11(1):17-21. doi:10.1177/1938640017694722

35. Meshkin DH, Zolper EG, Chang K, et al. Long-term mortality after nontraumatic major lower extremity amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60(3):567-576. doi:10.1053/J.JFAS.2020.06.027

36. da Silveira LMV, Guerreiro GP, Lisboa LAF, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft during the COVID-19 pandemic. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;35(6):1003-1006. doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0283

37. Fara A, Mitrev Z, Rosalia RA, Assas BM. Cytokine storm and COVID-19: a chronicle of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Open Biol. 2020;10(9):200160. doi:10.1098/RSOB.200160

38. Darif D, Hammi I, Kihel A, el Idrissi Saik I, Guessous F, Akarid K. The pro-inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 pathogenesis: what goes wrong? Microb Pathog. 2021;153:104799. doi:10.1016/J.MICPATH.2021.104799

39. Delgadillo LF, Lomakina EB, Kuebel J, Waugh RE. Changes in endothelial glycocalyx layer protective ability after inflammatory stimulus. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2021;320(2):C216-C224. doi:10.1152/AJPCELL.00259.2020

40. Patterson EK, Cepinskas G, Fraser DD. Endothelial glycocalyx degradation in critical illness and injury. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:898592. doi:10.3389/FMED.2022.898592

41. Chappell D, Brettner F, Doerfler N, et al. Protection of glycocalyx decreases platelet adhesion after ischaemia/reperfusion: an animal study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(9):474-481. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000085

42. Lipowsky HH. The endothelial glycocalyx as a barrier to leukocyte adhesion and its mediation by extracellular proteases. Ann Biomed Eng. 2012;40(4):840-848. doi:10.1007/S10439-011-0427-X

43. Shi C, Wang C, Wang H, et al. The potential of low molecular weight heparin to mitigate cytokine storm in severe COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(6):1087-1095. doi:10.1111/CTS.12880

44. Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1094-1099. doi:10.1111/JTH.14817

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement